Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Stomatal Research with Automated Aperture Measurement
Published on: February 9, 2024
Phylogenetic Relationships of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae Isolates Associated with Bacterial Inflorescence Rot
Stewart J Hall1, Ian B Dry2, Christopher L Blanchard3
1National Wine and Grape Industry Centre, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales Department of Primary Industries, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia 2650.
Abstract:
Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae causes extensive yield losses in wine-grape production in some Australian cool-climate vineyards. Putative P. syringae pv. syringae isolates from infected grapevines within a range of vineyards were genotyped using RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) using primers for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (gapA), citrate synthase (gltA), DNA gyrase B (gyrB), and σ factor 70 (rpoD). The isolates were also evaluated for pathogenicity by inoculation of detached grapevine leaves. The isolates were grouped by MLST data into two well-supported clades, each containing a mixture of pathogenic and nonpathogenic grapevine isolates, indicating that P. syringae pv. syringae in Australian vineyards is genetically diverse. Each clade also contained P. syringae pv. syringae from nongrape hosts pathogenic to grapevine, demonstrating a lack of host specificity and possible potential for cross-infection of grape and other horticultural crops. Furthermore, the isolation of pathogenic P. syringae pv. syringae isolates from grapevine sucker shoots suggests that sucker shoots may allow overwintering of the pathogen. The vineyard quarantine status of P. syringae pv. syringae may need to be reconsidered, due to its easy dispersal through pruning equipment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
pV-Diagrams
Phylogenetic Trees
Relationship Formation
Ending Relationships
Relationship Growth
Social Relationships and Well-Being

