Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
The ethical conundrum: Conflicting advocacy positions in advanced heart failure therapy
Denise M Dudzinski1,2, Claudius Mahr3, Jason Bjelkengren4
1Department of Bioethics & Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington.
Abstract:
It is estimated that nearly 6.5 million Americans over the age of 20 suffer from heart failure. Heart failure is the leading cause of hospitalization in patients over 65 years of age, and carries with it a 5-year mortality of nearly 50%. Despite advances in medical therapy, treatment for medically refractory end-stage, advanced heart failure is limited to heart transplant, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), or palliative care only. Patient selection in advanced heart failure (AHF) therapy is complex. Not only are the patients medically complicated, but providers are biased by their individual and collective experience with similar and dissimilar patients. Clinicians caring for AHF patients balance competing clinical and ethical demands, which appropriately leads to professional debate and disagreement. These debates are constructive because they clarify ethical and professional commitments and help to ensure fair and equitable treatment of AHF patients.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Ethics in Research
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics

