Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023
Effects of Denosumab and Alendronate on Bone Health and Vascular Function in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized,
Ken Iseri1,2, Makoto Watanabe1,2, Hisako Yoshikawa2
1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
Denosumab and alendronate effectively improved bone mineral density and reduced bone turnover markers in hemodialysis patients with osteoporosis. Both treatments demonstrated safety, though they did not impact cardiovascular markers.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Endocrinology
- Osteoporosis Research
Background:
- Mineral and bone disorders, including osteoporosis, are prevalent in hemodialysis patients, contributing to significant morbidity and mortality.
- The efficacy and safety of denosumab and alendronate for osteoporosis in this specific patient population remain largely unknown.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of denosumab versus intravenous alendronate in treating osteoporosis in hemodialysis patients.
- To compare changes in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD) and various bone turnover markers (BTM) between the two treatment groups.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, three-center study involving 48 hemodialysis patients diagnosed with osteoporosis.
- Randomization to either denosumab or intravenous alendronate, with initial supplementation of calcium and calcitriol for two weeks.
- Primary endpoint: percent change in LSBMD at 12 months; secondary endpoints included changes in BTM, cardiovascular parameters, and adverse events.
Main Results:
- Both denosumab and alendronate significantly decreased BTM and increased LSBMD at 12 months compared to baseline.
- No significant difference in LSBMD changes was observed between the denosumab and alendronate groups.
- Serum calcium, phosphorus, and intact parathyroid hormone levels were maintained within appropriate ranges in both groups. Cardiovascular markers showed no significant changes.
Conclusions:
- Denosumab and alendronate are effective in improving LSBMD and reducing BTM in hemodialysis patients with osteoporosis.
- Both agents appear to be safe for this patient group, with no significant adverse effects on cardiovascular parameters observed within the study period.
Abstract:
Mineral and bone disorders including osteoporosis are common in dialysis patients and contribute to increased morbimortality. However, whether denosumab and alendronate are effective and safe treatments in hemodialysis patients is not known. Thus, we conducted a prospective, three-center study of 48 hemodialysis patients who were diagnosed as having osteoporosis and had not received anti-osteoporotic agents previously. Participants were randomized to either denosumab or intravenous alendronate, and all subjects received elemental calcium and calcitriol during the initial 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percent change in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LSBMD) at 12 months of treatment. The secondary endpoints included the following: change in BMD at other sites; change of serum bone turnover markers (BTM), coronary artery calcium score (CACS), ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV), flow mediated dilation (FMD), and intima-media thickness at the carotid artery (CA-IMT); change from day 0 to day 14 in serum levels of Ca and P; time course of serum calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), and intact parathyroid hormone (i-PTH); new fractures; and adverse events. Initial supplementation with elemental calcium and calcitriol markedly ameliorated the decrease of serum corrected calcium (cCa) levels induced by denosumab during the first 2 weeks, whereas serum cCa levels in the alendronate group were increased. Denosumab and alendronate markedly decreased serum levels of BTM and increased LSBMD at 12 months compared with baseline. However, no significant differences were found in the changes in LSBMD between the two groups. The serum cCa, P, and i-PTH levels in the two groups were maintained within the appropriate range. In contrast to the anti-osteoporotic effects, no significant differences after 12 months of treatment were found in the CACS, CA-IMT, ABI, baPWV, and FMD compared with pretreatment in both groups. Denosumab and alendronate treatment improved LSBMD, reduced BTM, and appeared to be safe in hemodialysis patients with osteoporosis. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Essential Minerals for Bone Health
Calcium and Phosphorus
Calcium is a critical component of bones, especially in the form of calcium phosphate and calcium carbonate. Since the body cannot make calcium, it must be obtained from the diet. However, calcium cannot be absorbed from the small intestine without...
Role of Vitamins in Maintaining Bone Health
Vitamin A
Vitamin A is involved in the process of bone remodeling. Retinoic acid, the active metabolite of Vitamin A, has nuclear receptors in osteoblasts and osteoclasts, which are involved in bone remodeling.
Vitamin B12
Vitamin B12 acts as a cofactor during the formation of osteoblast-related proteins, such as osteocalcin. Vitamin B12 plays a role...
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Pharmacodynamics in Geriatric Patients: Effects of Age
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Transfer Function in Control Systems
To derive the transfer function, consider a general nth-order linear time-invariant...

