Impact of Diabetes on 30-Day Complications in Mastectomy and Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

Diabetic patients are known to be at increased risk of postoperative complications after multiple types of surgery. However, conflicting evidence exists regarding the association between diabetes and wound complications in mastectomy and breast reconstruction. This study evaluates the impact of diabetes on surgical outcomes after mastectomy procedures and implant-based breast reconstruction.

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database review from 2010 to 2015 identified patients undergoing total, partial, or subcutaneous mastectomy, as well as immediate or delayed implant reconstruction. Primary outcomes included postoperative wound complications and implant failure. Preoperative variables and outcomes were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Multivariate regression was used to control for confounders.

The following groups were identified: partial (n = 52,583), total (n = 41,540), and subcutaneous mastectomy (n = 3145), as well as immediate (n = 4663) and delayed (n = 4279) implant reconstruction. Diabetes was associated with higher rates of superficial incisional surgical site infection (SSI) in partial mastectomy (odds ratio [OR] = 8.66; P = 0.03). Diabetes was also associated with higher rates of deep incisional SSI (OR = 1.61; P = 0.01) in subcutaneous mastectomy and both superficial (OR = 1.56; P = 0.04) and deep incisional SSI (OR = 2.07; P = 0.04) in total mastectomy. Diabetes was not associated with any wound complications in immediate reconstruction but was associated with higher rates of superficial incisional SSI (OR = 17.46; P < 0.001) in the delayed reconstruction group. There was no association with implant failure in either group.

Evaluation of the largest national cohort of mastectomy and implant reconstructive procedures suggests that diabetic patients are at significantly increased risk of 30-d postoperative infectious wound complications but present no difference in rates of early implant failure.