[Resistance of DBA/2J Mice to the Chronic Social Defeat Stress]

Insights

Male DBA/2J mice exposed to chronic social defeat stress showed increased anxiety and reduced communication, but no depressive-like behaviors. This strain demonstrates resilience to chronic social stress, making them valuable for studying stress resistance mechanisms.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Science
  • Animal Models

Background:

  • Chronic social stress is a significant factor in mental health disorders.
  • Understanding stress resilience is crucial for developing effective treatments.
  • Social defeat is a relevant model for studying stress-induced behavioral changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the long-term behavioral effects of social defeat in male DBA/2J mice.
  • To assess the development of anxiety, depression, and other behavioral changes following chronic social stress.
  • To evaluate the potential of DBA/2J mice as a model for studying stress resilience.

Main Methods:

  • Male DBA/2J mice were subjected to long-term social defeat by aggressive C57BL/6J and DBA/2J partners.
  • Behavioral assessments included agonistic interactions, partition test, elevated plus maze, open field test, and Porsolt test.
  • Evaluated parameters included communicativeness, anxiety, locomotor activity, depressive-like behaviors, catalepsy, exploratory behavior, and social recognition.

Main Results:

  • DBA/2J mice did not alter their behavioral strategy during agonistic interactions after social defeat.
  • Reduced communicativeness and increased anxiety were observed in the partition and elevated plus maze tests.
  • No significant changes in locomotor activity, depressive-like behaviors, catalepsy, exploratory behavior, or social recognition were detected.

Conclusions:

  • Male DBA/2J mice exhibit relative resistance to developing depressive-like states under chronic social stress.
  • These mice may serve as a valuable model for investigating the mechanisms underlying stress resilience.
  • Further research using DBA/2J mice can elucidate factors contributing to stability under chronic stress.

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
32.4K
Social Scripts02:10

Social Scripts

People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
10.3K
Social Traps01:41

Social Traps

Social traps are negative situations where people get caught in a direction or relationship that later proves to be unpleasant, with no easy way to back out of or avoid. The concept was orignally introduced by John Platt who applied psychology to Garrett Hardin's "Tragedy of the Commons", where in New England herd owners could let their cattle graze in the common ground. This situation seems like a good idea, but an individual could have an advantage. If they owned...
26.9K
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
36.6K
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
39.7K
Social Exchange Theory02:06

Social Exchange Theory

We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K