Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Kohut's method of interpretation: a critique.

P Rubovits-Seitz1

  • 1George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
|January 1, 1988
PubMed
Summary

This study contrasts Sigmund Freud's pluralistic psychoanalytic interpretation methods with Heinz Kohut's empathy-based approach. It finds Kohut's monistic method has epistemologic limitations, suggesting improvements for clinical interpretation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The fallibility of interpretations.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1994
Same author

Interpretive methodology: some problems, limitations, and remedial strategies.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1992
Same author

Another report of anniversary reactions.

The American journal of psychiatry·1983
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychoanalysis
  • Psychotherapy

Background:

  • Sigmund Freud utilized a pluralistic methodology for interpreting unconscious meanings.
  • Heinz Kohut proposed a simplified interpretive approach centered on empathy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To reevaluate Heinz Kohut's monistic interpretive methodology.
  • To compare Kohut's approach with traditional psychoanalytic interpretation.
  • To identify epistemologic limitations and suggest improvements for clinical interpretation.

Main Methods:

  • Review and evaluation of Kohut's interpretive method.
  • Analysis of case material from Kohut's final book.
  • Comparison of Kohut's unidimensional approach with Freud's pluralistic methodology.

Main Results:

  • Kohut's interpretive method is characterized by its reliance on a single, subjective method (empathy).
  • A comparison reveals significant differences between Kohut's approach and Freud's diverse interpretive strategies.
  • The study identifies epistemologic liabilities inherent in Kohut's unidimensional interpretive framework.

Conclusions:

  • Kohut's monistic interpretive methodology presents epistemologic challenges.
  • Improvements in clinical interpretation can be achieved by adopting more appropriate strategies.
  • A pluralistic approach may offer a more robust framework for psychoanalytic interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos