Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Accurate Prediction of Hyperfine Coupling Tensors for Main Group Elements Using a Unitary Group Based Rigorously
1Institut für Physikalische Chemie , Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz , Duesbergweg 10-14 , 55128 Mainz , Germany.
Abstract:
We present the development of a perturbative triples correction scheme for the previously reported unitary group based spin-adapted combinatoric open-shell coupled-cluster (CC) singles and doubles (COS-CCSD) approach and report on the applications of the newly developed method, termed "COS-CCSD(T)", to the calculation of hyperfine coupling (HFC) tensors for radicals consisting of hydrogen, second- and third-row elements. The COS-CCSD(T) method involves a single noniterative step with [Formula: see text] scaling of the computational cost for the calculation of triples corrections to the energy. The key feature of this development is the use of spatial semicanonical orbitals generated from standard restricted open-shell Hartree-Fock (ROHF) orbitals, which allows the unperturbed Hamiltonian operator to be defined in terms of a diagonal spin-free Fock operator. The HFC tensors are computed as a first-order property via implementation of an analytic derivative scheme. The required one-particle spin density matrix is computed by using one- and two-particle spin-free density matrices that are obtained from the analytic derivative implementation, in this way avoiding the use of any spin-dependent operator and maintaining spin adaptation of the CC wavefunction. Benchmark calculations of HFC tensors for a set of 21 radicals indicate reasonably good agreement of the COS-CCSD(T) results with experiment and a consistent improvement over the COS-CCSD method. We demonstrate that the accuracies of the isotropic hyperfine coupling constants obtained in unrestricted HF (UHF) reference based spin-orbital CCSD(T) calculations deteriorate when spin contamination in the UHF wavefunction is large, and the results may even become qualitatively incorrect when spin polarization is the driving mechanism. Within a similar noniterative perturbative treatment of triple excitations, the spin-adapted COS-CCSD(T) approach produces accurate results, thus ensuring cost-effectiveness together with reliability.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
G-protein Coupled Receptors

