Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Manipulation of Rhythmic Food Intake in Mice Using a Custom-Made Feeding System
Published on: December 16, 2022
Early Total Enteral Feeding versus Conventional Enteral Feeding in Stable Very-Low-Birth-Weight Infants: A Randomised
Sushma Nangia1, Vinoth Vadivel2, Anu Thukral3
1Department of Neonatology, Lady Hardinge Medical College and associated hospitals, New Delhi, India, drsnangia@gmail.com.
Insights
Early total enteral feeding (ETEF) in stable very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants helps them achieve full enteral feeds sooner. This approach also reduces hospital stay duration without increasing risks of feed intolerance or necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Nutrition and Gastroenterology
- Pediatric Critical Care
Background:
- Optimizing nutritional support is crucial for very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants.
- Conventional enteral feeding (CEF) protocols may delay achieving full enteral feeds.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare early total enteral feeding (ETEF) with CEF in stable VLBW infants.
- To assess the impact of ETEF on the time to achieve full enteral feeds.
Main Methods:
- An unblinded randomized controlled trial involving 180 stable VLBW infants.
- Infants were assigned to either ETEF (initiated with total enteral feeds) or CEF (initiated with minimal enteral nutrition).
- Primary outcome: postnatal age at full enteral feeds; secondary outcomes: feed intolerance, sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), and hospital stay duration.
Main Results:
- ETEF group achieved full enteral feeds significantly earlier (6.5 days) compared to CEF (10.1 days).
- ETEF group experienced fewer episodes of feed intolerance and clinical sepsis.
- Hospital stay duration was shorter in the ETEF group (15.5 days) versus CEF (19.6 days); NEC incidence was similar.
Conclusions:
- Early total enteral feeding (ETEF) is effective in accelerating the achievement of full enteral feeds in stable VLBW infants.
- ETEF reduces hospital stay duration without increasing the risk of feed intolerance or NEC.
- This feeding strategy offers a beneficial approach to neonatal intensive care for VLBW infants.
Objective:
To evaluate the effect of early total enteral feeding (ETEF) when compared with conventional enteral feeding (CEF) in stable very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; 1,000-1,499 g) infants on the postnatal age (in days) at attaining full enteral feeds.
Methods:
In this unblinded randomised controlled trial, 180 infants were allocated to an ETEF (n = 91) or a CEF group (n = 89). Feeds were initiated as total enteral feeds in the ETEF group and as minimal enteral nutrition (20 mL/kg) in the CEF group. The rest of the day's requirement in the CEF group was provided as parenteral fluids. The primary outcome was postnatal age at attaining full enteral feeds. The secondary outcomes included episodes of feed intolerance, incidence of sepsis and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), and duration of hospital stay.
Results:
The baseline variables including birth weight and gestational age were similar in the two groups. The infants of the ETEF group attained full enteral feeds earlier than those of the CEF group (6.5 ± 1.5 vs. 10.1 ± 4.1 days postnatal age; mean difference -3.6 [-4.5 to -2.7]; p < 0.001). Total episodes of feed intolerance and clinical sepsis were fewer, with a shorter duration of hospital stay, in the ETEF group (15.5 vs. 19.6 days) (p = 0.01). The incidence of NEC was similar in the two groups.
Conclusion:
ETEF in stable VLBW infants results in earlier attainment of full feeds and decreases the duration of hospital stay without any increased risk of feed intolerance or NEC.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Birth Control Methods
Drug Delivery: Enteral Route
Routes of Drug Administration: Enteral
Enteral administration involves drug administration via the mouth in two ways: orally or sublingually.
Unlike sublingually drugs, drugs that are taken orally pass through the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and get metabolized by the liver. Once metabolized, the drug is absorbed into the systemic circulation, reaching different body parts via the bloodstream. However, while passing through the stomach,...
Physiology of Enteric Nervous System and Gut Health

