Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

A Modified Trier Social Stress Test for Vulnerable Mexican American Adolescents
Published on: July 10, 2017
Estimating landslides vulnerability in Rwanda using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system.
Lamek Nahayo1,2,3,4,5, Felix Ndayisaba4,5,6, Fidele Karamage4,5,7
1State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, Xinjiang.
Landslide vulnerability in Rwanda was assessed using field data and GIS. Altitude, slope, soil, lithology, and rainfall were key factors, with results aiding hazard mitigation and planning.
Area of Science:
- Geosciences
- Environmental Science
- Risk Assessment
Background:
- Landslides pose significant social, economic, and environmental risks to communities.
- Vulnerability assessment is crucial for effective disaster preparedness, response, and mitigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate landslide vulnerability in the western province of Rwanda.
- To identify key factors contributing to landslide occurrence and severity.
Main Methods:
- A landslide inventory map was created from field surveys and secondary data (96 landslides).
- Ten conditioning factors (altitude, slope, NDVI, land use, distance to roads, soil texture, rainfall, lithology, population density, communication tools) were analyzed.
- The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) within a Geographic Information System (GIS) were employed for spatial estimation.
Main Results:
- Altitude (19.7%), slope angles (16.1%), soil texture (14.3%), lithology (13.5%), and rainfall (12.2%) were identified as the most significant vulnerability factors.
- A landslide vulnerability map was generated, classified into five categories: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high.
- Validation using the relative landslides density index (R-index) confirmed the map's accuracy, with a significant percentage of past landslides falling into moderate to very high vulnerability zones.
Conclusions:
- The methodology effectively estimated landslide vulnerability and produced a reliable vulnerability map for the study area.
- The findings provide valuable data for policymakers to implement hazard mitigation strategies and inform future land-use planning.
- The study underscores the importance of integrating various geospatial data and analytical techniques for robust landslide risk assessment.
Related Concept Videos
Hierarchy of Motor Control
Maslow's Need Hierarchy Theory
At the pyramid's base are physiological needs, including food, water, and shelter...
Selected Data About Geographic Locations
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Development of Analytical Methods
Analyte Adsorption and Distribution

