Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

In Silico Clinical Trials for Cardiovascular Disease
Published on: May 27, 2022
Synergy of Dual Pathway Inhibition in Chronic Cardiovascular Disease
Michiel Coppens1, Jeffrey I Weitz2, John W A Eikelboom2,3
1From the Department of Vascular Medicine, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, location AMC, the Netherlands (M.C.).
Insights
Dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin significantly reduces cardiovascular events and mortality in high-risk patients. This approach offers improved outcomes compared to aspirin alone, despite increased bleeding risk.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Acetylsalicylic acid is standard for secondary cardiovascular prevention, but recurrent ischemic events persist.
- Intensified antithrombotic therapies reduce cardiovascular events but increase bleeding without improving mortality.
- Dual pathway inhibition offers a novel strategy for managing cardiovascular risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the COMPASS trial results on dual pathway inhibition.
- To explain the superiority of dual pathway inhibition over single antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy.
- To compare rivaroxaban plus aspirin with other antithrombotic regimens and guide clinical application.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial.
- Comparison of dual pathway inhibition (low-dose rivaroxaban plus aspirin) versus aspirin alone.
- Evaluation of major adverse cardiovascular events, limb events, mortality, and bleeding.
Main Results:
- Dual pathway inhibition reduced major adverse cardiovascular events by 24% and mortality by 18% compared to aspirin alone.
- Significant reductions were observed in major adverse limb events (47%) and overall mortality.
- Major bleeding increased by 70%, but fatal or intracranial bleeding did not increase.
Conclusions:
- Dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban and aspirin is superior to aspirin alone for secondary prevention in patients with coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease.
- This strategy effectively reduces ischemic events and mortality, offering a significant benefit-risk profile.
- Clinical application of COMPASS trial findings can optimize antithrombotic therapy in high-risk cardiovascular patients.
Abstract:
Although acetylsalicylic acid is of proven benefit for secondary prevention in patients with cardiovascular disease, the risk of recurrent ischemic events remains high. Intensification of antithrombotic therapy with more potent antiplatelet drugs, dual antiplatelet therapy, or vitamin K antagonists further reduces the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events compared with acetylsalicylic acid alone but increases the risk of bleeding without reducing mortality. In patients with prior coronary artery disease or peripheral arterial disease the COMPASS (Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies) trial revealed that compared with acetylsalicylic acid alone, dual pathway inhibition with low-dose rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice-daily), an oral factor Xa inhibitor, plus acetylsalicylic acid reduced major adverse cardiovascular event by 24%, major adverse limb events by 47%, and mortality by 18%. Major bleeding was increased by 70%, but there was no increase in fatal or intracranial bleeding. This article (1) reviews the results of the COMPASS trial, (2) explains why dual pathway inhibition is superior to antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy alone, (3) compares the results with rivaroxaban plus aspirin with those with other antithrombotic regimens, and (4) provides insight into how best to apply the COMPASS results into practice.
Related Concept Videos
Psychoneuroimmunology: Cardiovascular Disease
A key area of focus in PNI is the relationship between stress and coronary...
Feedback Inhibition
Chronic Kidney Disease I: Introduction
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Smoking is a primary risk factor for COPD, with over 80% of patients having a history of it. Patients typically experience progressive dyspnea or labored breathing, frequent coughing, and recurrent pulmonary infections. Many eventually succumb to respiratory failure, characterized by...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-II: Pathophysiology
Chronic Inflammation
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-I: Introduction

