Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

How to Administer Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Critically ill Neonates, Infants, and Children
Published on: August 19, 2020
Necessity of Intracranial Imaging in Infants and Children With Macrocephaly
Megan A Sampson1, Aaron D Berg2, Jody N Huber1
1Department of Pediatrics, Sanford USD Medical Center, Sanford Children's Hospital, Sioux Falls, South Dakota; University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Vermillion, South Dakota.
Insights
Macrocephaly in infants often leads to imaging, but risk factors like developmental delay or neurological symptoms can identify those needing further evaluation. A positive family history may predict normal imaging results, reducing the need for scans.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Medical Imaging
- Clinical Risk Assessment
Background:
- Macrocephaly is a common pediatric condition frequently prompting neuroimaging.
- Current imaging guidelines for macrocephaly are lacking from major pediatric and radiology organizations.
- This study aims to identify risk factors for pathologic macrocephaly to guide clinical imaging decisions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify clinical risk factors associated with pathologic macrocephaly.
- To assist clinicians in determining which pediatric patients with macrocephaly would benefit from neuroimaging.
- To reduce unnecessary imaging in pediatric patients with macrocephaly.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective medical record review was conducted across a multistate healthcare system from 2012-2016.
- Patients under 36 months with macrocephaly were identified, and data on demographics, imaging, and clinical outcomes were collected.
- Key data points included developmental delay, neurological symptoms, and family history of macrocephaly.
Main Results:
- Out of 169 patients, 13 had abnormal imaging studies, with five yielding high clinical significance.
- Abnormal imaging results were significantly associated with developmental delay (P=0.04) and neurological symptoms (P=0.015).
- A positive family history of macrocephaly was predictive of normal imaging findings (P=0.004), and no sedation complications occurred.
Conclusions:
- Intracranial imaging may not be necessary for children with macrocephaly who lack specific risk factors or have a positive family history.
- Developmental delay and neurological symptoms are key risk factors indicating potential imaging abnormalities requiring further management.
- This research aids in refining the diagnostic approach to pediatric macrocephaly, optimizing the use of neuroimaging.
Background:
Macrocephaly is frequently encountered in pediatrics and often leads to imaging. There are no recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics or the American College of Radiology providing imaging guidelines for macrocephaly. The goal of this study is to identify risk factors for pathologic macrocephaly and to aid the clinician in identifying patients that would benefit from imaging.
Methods:
We conducted a medical record review throughout a multistate health care system, Sanford Health, from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. Patients with macrocephaly were identified by problem list in children aged less than 36 months. Data collection included basic demographics, imaging modality, developmental delay, prematurity, seizures, focal neurological symptoms, family history of macrocephaly, sedation used, and sedation complications.
Results:
A total of 169 patients were included in the analysis. Imaging modalities included 39 magnetic resonance imagings (23.1%), 47 cranial computed tomographies (27.8%), and 83 head ultrasounds (49.1%). Imaging results demonstrated 13 abnormal studies with five of those studies being abnormal with high clinical yield. Patients with abnormal studies were more likely to have developmental delay (P = 0.04) or neurological symptoms (P = 0.015). Positive family history of macrocephaly was predictive of normal imaging (P = 0.004). There were no sedation complications.
Conclusions:
Intracranial imaging does not appear to be necessary in children with no risk factors and or a positive family history of macrocephaly. Risk factors such as developmental delay or neurological symptoms could identify children at risk for imaging abnormalities that require further management.
More Related Videos
08:38Electroretinogram Recording for Infants and Children under Anesthesia to Achieve Optimal Dark Adaptation and International Standards
Published on: September 3, 2020
05:10Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
Published on: March 17, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
X-ray Imaging
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging