Comparative Evaluation of Angioscopy and Intravascular Ultrasound for Assessing Plaque Protrusion During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedures
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026
A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Hiroshi Kondo1, Yoshihiro Kiura1, Shigeyuki Sakamoto2
1Department of Neurosurgery and Neuroendovascular Therapy, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Background:
Evaluation of plaque protrusion after carotid artery stenting (CAS) is important for predicting periprocedural ischemic complications. In contrast to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), angioscopy allows direct visualization of the plaque. The aim of this study was to evaluate utility and safety of angioscopy during CAS and compare it with IVUS.
Methods:
The study included 13 carotid artery stenosis lesions in 11 consecutive patients (mean age 70.5 years; 10 men) at a single center. During CAS procedure, poststenting plaque protrusion was evaluated with angioscopy and IVUS.
Results:
Mean level of internal carotid artery stenosis was 79.2%. Eight lesions were symptomatic, and 5 lesions were predicted to have vulnerable plaque by preprocedural magnetic resonance imaging. A carotid WALLSTENT was placed in all cases. After stenting, angioscopy provided good visualization in all cases. Plaque protrusions were observed in 1 case by IVUS and in 8 cases by angioscopy. Diffusion-weighted imaging showed positive lesions in 3 cases (23%). For 2 of these lesions, plaque protrusions were observed by angioscopy but not by IVUS. All lesions associated with positive diffusion-weighted imaging findings were observed to have yellow plaque on angioscopy.
Conclusions:
Angioscopy provided direct visualization of stent lumens after CAS. Angioscopy detected more plaque protrusion than IVUS and allowed clearer observation of plaque characteristics. Angioscopy may be more useful than IVUS for examination of plaque protrusion and plaque evaluation after CAS, especially for plaque identified as potentially vulnerable by preprocedural examination.
More Related Videos
09:43In vivo Near Infrared Fluorescence NIRF Intravascular Molecular Imaging of Inflammatory Plaque, a Multimodal Approach to Imaging of Atherosclerosis
Published on: August 4, 2011
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
01:28Types of Membrane Protrusions
The microvilli, an example of stable protrusions, are finger-like projections...
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment:
01:19Assessing Body Temperature - Temporal Artery
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don a fresh pair of gloves to prevent cross-infection and ensure patient safety.
Step 2: Explain the procedure to the patient to establish trust. Clear communication establishes trust with the patient, ensures they understand what to expect, promotes cooperation, and enhances comfort during the procedure.
Step 3: Assess the patient's...
01:21Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
01:25Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):
02:26Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...