Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

983
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
983
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K
Sum and Difference OpAmps01:22

Sum and Difference OpAmps

1.4K
Operational amplifiers (op-amps) are versatile devices that extend beyond amplification. In this context, two specific op-amp configurations are explored: the summing and difference amplifiers.
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
1.4K
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform01:24

Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform

637
The z-transform is a powerful tool for analyzing practical discrete-time systems, often represented by linear difference equations. Solving a higher-order difference equation requires knowledge of the input signal and the initial conditions up to one term less than the order of the equation.
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
637

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Localization of Free-Field Sound Sources in the Chronic Phase of Mild Ischemic Stroke.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Towards model-based characterization of individual electrically stimulated nerve fibers.

PLoS computational biology·2026
Same author

Bimodal Cochlear Implants: Measurement of the Localization Performance as a Function of Device Latency Difference.

Trends in hearing·2025
Same author

Notched noise reveals differential improvement in the neural representation of the sound envelope.

Communications biology·2025
Same author

An Adaptive Leaky-Integrate and Firing Probability Model of an Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve Fiber.

Trends in hearing·2024
Same author

Longitudinal observations of the effects of ischemic stroke on binaural perception.

Frontiers in neuroscience·2024
Same journal

Sibilant differentiation before and after tongue cancer surgery: Acoustics, kinematics and the role of sensorimotor controla).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

BioNet-A: Ultrasonic echo representation network for target discrimination using active SONAR.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Empty soft-drink cans and mass-loaded rods: Analogous homework problems from acoustic and mechanical domains.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Erratum: Statistical wave field theory: Anisotropic wave fields under Neumann's boundary condition [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 159(3), 2265-2280 (2026)].

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

On the modification of tip leakage noise sources by porous treatment.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

An educational opportunity: Acoustics in an empty room.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor
06:03

Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor

Published on: March 22, 2024

1.6K

Smallest perceivable interaural time differences.

Sinthiya Thavam1, Mathias Dietz1

  • 1National Centre for Audiology, School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Faculty of Health Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario N6G 1H1, Canada.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|February 4, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers identified optimal conditions for measuring interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity. The best stimulus was filtered Gaussian noise, yielding thresholds as low as 6.9 μs for trained listeners.

More Related Videos

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K
Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor
06:03

Author Spotlight: Advancing Real-Time cAMP Detection in Cells Using cADDis Biosensor

Published on: March 22, 2024

1.6K
Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila
09:34

Assessing Differences in Sperm Competitive Ability in Drosophila

Published on: August 22, 2013

15.0K
Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia
08:32

Sex Differences in Mouse Hippocampal Astrocytes after In-Vitro Ischemia

Published on: October 25, 2016

13.9K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Established minimum interaural time difference (ITD) discrimination thresholds near 10 μs for normal hearing.
  • Limited data on subject hearing/training status and optimal measurement techniques in prior ITD studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Identify stimulus and experimental methods maximizing ITD sensitivity.
  • Establish precise ITD threshold reference values for trained and untrained normal-hearing listeners.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Gaussian noise, band-pass filtered (20–1400 Hz) at 70 dB SPL as the optimal stimulus.
  • Employed a two-interval procedure with a 50 ms interstimulus interval for measurement.
  • Determined thresholds at 75% correct performance level.

Main Results:

  • The optimal stimulus and method yielded the lowest ITD thresholds.
  • Average ITD thresholds were 6.9 μs for trained listeners (n=9) and 18.1 μs for untrained listeners (n=52).

Conclusions:

  • Optimized stimulus and methods significantly enhance ITD sensitivity measurement.
  • Provides crucial reference ITD thresholds for both trained and untrained normal-hearing individuals.