Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Designing CAD/CAM Surgical Guides for Maxillary Reconstruction Using an In-house Approach
Published on: August 24, 2018
Influence of Preparation Reconstruction on the Compressive Strength of CAD/CAM Ceramic Inlays
Bruna Salamoni Sinhori1, Luiz Clovis Cardoso Vieira2, Luiz Narciso Baratieri2
1Professor Graduate Curses Operative Dentistry, University of Caxias do Sul, Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil.
Lithium disilicate ceramic inlays showed comparable compressive strength regardless of substrate (dentin or composite resin). While not matching sound teeth, these restorations are sufficient for chewing forces.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Dental restorations aim to restore tooth function and strength.
- Lithium disilicate ceramics offer favorable aesthetics and mechanical properties for inlays.
- Understanding substrate influence on restoration strength is crucial for clinical success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of substrate (dentin vs. composite resin) on the compressive strength of lithium disilicate ceramic inlays.
- To compare the fracture strength of restored teeth to that of nonrestored teeth.
Main Methods:
- Thirty human maxillary third molars were prepared and divided into three groups: sound teeth (control), teeth with preparations in tooth structure, and teeth with composite resin build-up restored with lithium disilicate inlays.
- Standardized Class II MOD preparations were performed.
- Compressive strength testing was conducted at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min.
Main Results:
- The fracture strength of sound teeth (control group) was significantly higher than both restored groups.
- No statistically significant difference in fracture strength was found between the two groups of restored teeth (dentin substrate vs. composite resin substrate).
- Both lithium disilicate inlay groups demonstrated statistically equivalent fracture strengths.
Conclusions:
- The substrate material (dentin or composite resin) does not significantly affect the compressive strength of lithium disilicate ceramic inlays.
- While restored teeth did not achieve the strength of sound teeth, the lithium disilicate inlays provide sufficient strength to withstand physiological masticatory forces.
Related Concept Videos
Relation Between Tensile Strength and Compressive Strength of Concrete
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...
Acid Strength and Molecular Structure
In the absence of any leveling effect, the acid strength of binary compounds of hydrogen with nonmetals (A) increases as the H-A bond strength decreases down a group in the periodic table. For group 17, the order of increasing acidity is HF < HCl < HBr < HI. Likewise, for group 16, the order of increasing acid strength is H2O < H2S < H2Se < H2Te. Across a row in the periodic table, the acid strength of binary hydrogen compounds increases with increasing...
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Strength and Heat of Hydration
The heat of hydration for each cement compound is significant; for instance, tricalcium aluminate (C3A) and...

