Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Relationship Between Lipotoxicity and HFpEF
Published on: March 29, 2024
Prognostic implications of plasma volume status estimates in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: insights
Justin L Grodin1, Steven Philips1, Wilfried Mullens2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Insights
In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), higher plasma volume status (PVS) is linked to increased risks. Specifically, elevated PVS independently predicts a greater likelihood of heart failure hospitalizations.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Internal Medicine
Background:
- Plasma volume status (PVS) is crucial in heart failure management.
- Previous studies often excluded or underrepresented patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the association between calculated PVS and clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF.
- To address the gap in understanding PVS relevance for HFpEF prognosis.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from 3414 TOPCAT trial participants with available hematocrit and weight.
- Calculated relative PVS using the Hakim formula and compared it to ideal plasma volume.
- Employed multivariable Cox proportional hazards models to assess PVS and outcomes.
Main Results:
- The majority of HFpEF patients (91.1%) exhibited relative volume contraction (PVS ≤ 0%).
- Each 5% increase in PVS correlated with significantly higher risks of the composite endpoint, all-cause death, and HF hospitalization.
- After adjusting for natriuretic peptides, PVS remained significantly associated only with HF hospitalization risk.
Conclusions:
- Elevated PVS is an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcomes in HFpEF.
- The strongest association was observed between higher PVS and increased risk of heart failure hospitalization.
Aims:
Plasma volume expansion is clinically and prognostically relevant in individuals with heart failure. Prior cohorts either excluded or had limited representation of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to examine the relationship between calculated plasma volume status (PVS) and outcomes in HFpEF.
Methods And Results:
We included enrollees from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial (TOPCAT) with available haematocrit and weight data (n = 3414). Plasma volume was derived from the Hakim formula and compared to estimates of ideal plasma volume to generate a relative PVS. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models tested the association of PVS with clinical outcomes. The median PVS was -11.9% (25th-75th percentile: -17.2% to -6.4%) and the majority (91.1%) had PVS consistent with relative volume contraction (PVS ≤ 0%) as opposed to volume expansion (8.9%, PVS > 0%). After multivariable adjustment, each 5% increment in PVS was associated with a ∼11%, 14%, and 12% higher risk for the primary composite endpoint, all-cause death, and heart failure hospitalization, respectively (P < 0.002 for all), but not cardiovascular death (P = 0.051). After additional adjustment for natriuretic peptides, PVS only remained associated with heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.10, 95% confidence interval 1.001-1.21, P = 0.047). There were no significant interactions between spironolactone use and the PVS-risk relationship for any endpoint (P > 0.1 for all).
Conclusion:
Higher calculated estimates of PVS were independently associated with a higher risk of long-term clinical outcomes in HFpEF, and particularly, heart failure hospitalization.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

