Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Design to Implementation Study for Development and Patient Validation of Paper-Based Toehold Switch Diagnostics
Published on: June 17, 2022
Enhanced Performance of Next-Generation Sequencing Diagnostics Compared With Standard of Care Microbiological
Silke Grumaz1, Christian Grumaz1, Yevhen Vainshtein1
1Fraunhofer IGB, Stuttgart, Germany.
Objectives:
Culture-based diagnostics represent the standard of care in septic patients, but are highly insensitive and in many cases unspecific. We recently demonstrated the general feasibility of next-generation sequencing-based diagnostics using free circulating nucleic acids (cell-free DNA) in plasma samples of septic patients. Within the presented investigation, higher performance of next-generation sequencing-based diagnostics was validated by comparison to matched blood cultures.
Design:
A secondary analysis of a prospective, observational, single-center study.
Setting:
Surgical ICU of a university hospital and research laboratory.
Patients:
Fifty patients with septic shock, 20 uninfected patients with elective surgery as control cohort.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
From 256 plasma samples of 48 septic patients at up to seven consecutive time points within the 28-day observation period, cell-free DNA was isolated and analyzed by next-generation sequencing and relevance scoring. In parallel, results from culture-based diagnostics (e.g., blood culture) were obtained. Plausibility of blood culture and next-generation sequencing results as well as adequacy of antibiotic therapy was evaluated by an independent expert panel. In contrast to blood culture with a positivity rate of 33% at sepsis onset, the positivity rate for next-generation sequencing-based pathogen identification was 72%. Over the whole study period, blood culture positivity was 11%, and next-generation sequencing positivity was 71%. Ninety-six percent of positive next-generation sequencing results for acute sepsis time points were plausible and would have led to a change to a more adequate therapy in 53% of cases as assessed by the expert evaluation.
Conclusions:
Our results show that next-generation sequencing-based analyses of bloodstream infections provide a valuable diagnostic platform for the identification of clinically relevant pathogens with higher sensitivity and specificity than blood culture, indicating that patients might benefit from a more appropriate therapy based on next-generation sequencing-based diagnosis.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Urinary Tract Infection III: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Standards of Care II
Standards of Care I
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...

