Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

31.8K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.8K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

51.6K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
51.6K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

100.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
100.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

81.6K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
81.6K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enhanced Brain Connectivity Following Six Weeks of Upper Extremity Offset Loading in Neurotypical Adults-A Preliminary Study.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Overview of an ongoing clinical trial on hand prostheses: Toward use of synergy-based prosthetic hands for activities of daily living by transradial amputees.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2026
Same author

The ExtRA Capacity Test: Reliability, validity and normative data of a new clinical tool for assessing shoulder muscle performance.

Physiotherapy·2026
Same author

Sensorimotor Parameters Predict Performance on the Bead Maze Hand Function Test.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Neuromechanical Predictors of Clinical Scores of Balance and Functional Mobility in Chronic Stroke Survivors - A Machine Learning Approach.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025
Same author

Artificial intelligence-based deep learning model for evaluating procedural consistency in microvascular anastomosis.

Journal of neurosurgery·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.4K

Sensorimotor uncertainty modulates corticospinal excitability during skilled object manipulation.

Marco Davare1,2, Pranav J Parikh3,4, Marco Santello4

  • 1Department of Movement Sciences and Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven , Belgium.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|February 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Sensorimotor memory aids grasp force planning, but unpredictable object contact shifts control to feedback mechanisms. Corticospinal excitability changes after contact reveal this adaptive sensorimotor processing.

Keywords:
M1fingerforcestranscranial magnetic stimulation

More Related Videos

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

2.1K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation
12:33

Corticospinal Excitability Modulation During Action Observation

Published on: December 31, 2013

9.4K
Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior
05:05

Assessing Corticospinal Excitability During Goal-Directed Reaching Behavior

Published on: December 2, 2022

2.1K
Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring Olfactory Influences on Corticospinal Excitability - Insights and Innovations in Neurological Research

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Motor Control
  • Human Sensorimotor System

Background:

  • Sensorimotor memory enables feedforward grasp force planning when contact points are stable.
  • Unpredictable grasp locations increase trial-to-trial variability, necessitating adaptive force modulation.
  • This suggests a shift from memory-based to feedback-based control mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate sensorimotor transformation mechanisms during object manipulation.
  • To determine how fingertip placement uncertainty influences the reliance on memory versus feedback control.
  • To examine the role of corticospinal excitability in response to sensorimotor uncertainty.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects grasped and lifted an object with an asymmetrical center of mass.
  • Two conditions manipulated fingertip position predictability while keeping average position and force distribution similar.
  • Corticospinal excitability was measured using transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Main Results:

  • Sensorimotor uncertainty affected corticospinal excitability after object contact, but not before.
  • This indicates a rapid tuning of sensorimotor integration post-contact.
  • The findings support a shift in control mechanisms based on digit placement predictability.

Conclusions:

  • The balance between predictive (memory-based) and feedback mechanisms in force control depends on grasp predictability.
  • Distinct sensorimotor integration processes are engaged based on the need for feedback versus memory.
  • Corticospinal excitability shortly after contact reflects the processing demands of these distinct mechanisms.