Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Examination of Host Phenotypes in Gambusia affinis Following Antibiotic Treatment
Published on: February 22, 2017
Should There Be A Part II ABPMR Examination?: A Psychometric Inquiry
Anthony Chiodo1, Mikaela Raddatz2, Sherilyn W Driscoll3
1Michigan Medicine, Department of PM&R, 325 E. Eisenhower Parkway, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108.
Background:
Certification by the American Board of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (ABPMR) requires passing both a written multiple choice examination (Part I) and an oral examination (Part II), but it has been unclear whether the two examinations measure the same or different dimensions of knowledge.
Objective:
To evaluate the concordance between the Part I and Part II examinations for ABPMR initial certification with regard to candidate performance on the examinations and their subsets. Our question is whether the Part II examination provides additional assessment of a candidate beyond what Part I provides.
Design:
Retrospective psychometric evaluation of deidentified board examination scores.
Setting:
ABPMR database of Part I and Part II examination scores.
Participants:
Candidates for the ABPMR Part I and Part II examinations after 2005, with a more detailed analysis of candidates for the Part I examination from 2014 to 2016. Examination scores of candidates who took the Part II examination both before and after the examination was standardized in 2005 were also used for an additional analysis.
Methods:
Correlations, simple linear regressions, and principal components analysis.
Main Outcome Measurements:
Correlation coefficients, variance analysis, and unexplained variance in the principal components analysis.
Results:
There is a weak to moderate correlation between performance on the Part I and Part II examinations: r = 0.33, P < .001. There is an additional dimension of assessment that is demonstrated on the Part II examination, with this being primarily in the domains of systems-based practice and interpersonal communication skills.
Conclusion:
The Part I and Part II examinations, although with some overlap, contribute different and meaningful components to the overall evaluation of candidates for board certification in PM&R.
Level Of Evidence:
III.
Related Concept Videos
Urologic Endoscopic Procedure: Cystoscopic Examination
Factorial Design
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Attitudes
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Families
Occasionally these regions can be adapted to take on new roles within the organism, becoming novel genes...

