Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Hypertension Targeting 120 mmHg: survival benefit after 3 years, but high renal risk
Insights
Lowering systolic blood pressure to 120 mmHg reduced mortality in high-risk patients compared to 135 mmHg. However, intensive treatment increased serious adverse effects, limiting generalizability for hypertension management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Trials
- Public Health
Background:
- Hypertension management guidelines vary, impacting cardiovascular event risk.
- Previous research suggests benefits of stricter blood pressure control.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the effect of intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure targets on mortality.
- To assess the safety profile of intensive blood pressure reduction.
Main Methods:
- A randomized trial involving patients aged 50+ at high cardiovascular risk.
- Comparison of an intensive systolic blood pressure target (around 120 mmHg) versus a standard target (around 135 mmHg).
Main Results:
- The intensive treatment group showed a reduction in all-cause mortality (3.3% vs. 4.5%) over approximately 3 years.
- Serious adverse effects, particularly renal issues, doubled in the intensive treatment group.
- The trial was not blinded.
Conclusions:
- Intensive systolic blood pressure lowering may reduce mortality in specific high-risk populations.
- The observed survival benefit must be weighed against a significant increase in adverse events.
- Findings are not generalizable to the broader hypertensive patient population due to specific inclusion criteria and adverse event profile.
Abstract:
In a randomised trial, reducing the systolic blood pressure target to around 120 mmHg led to a reduction in all-cause mortality compared to a tar- get of around 135 mmHg: after about 3 years, 3.3% of patients in the "inten- sive" treatment group had died versus 4.5% in the "standard" treatment group. The trial was not blinded, however.The patients included were aged 50 years or older, at high risk of cardiovascular events, often overweight but not dia- betic, and had no history of stroke or symptomatic heart failure. This survival benefit was accompan- ied by a twofold increase in serious adverse effects, in particular renal effects, and cannot be extrapolated to the majority of hypertensive patients.
Related Concept Videos
Benefits of Self-Esteem
Survival Curves
The Kaplan-Meier estimator is the most common method for constructing survival curves. This...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Relative Risk
Hypertension I: Introduction
Hypertension II: Pathophysiology

