Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
Published on: March 26, 2015
A Biomechanical Comparison of Single-, Double-, and Triple-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions Using a
Tomoyuki Suzuki1, Konsei Shino2, Satoshi Yamakawa3
1Department of Orthopedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, Japan.
Purpose:
The first objective of our cadaveric study was to perform a biomechanical comparison of single-bundle (SB), double-bundle (DB), and triple-bundle (TB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions using a hamstring tendon graft to determine the laxity match pre-tension (LMP) value, which is the tension within the graft required to re-create the same anterior laxity as the ACL-intact knee. The second objective was to determine the anterior laxity and force distribution during the application of both an anterior force and a simulated pivot-shift test.
Methods:
Eleven fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor system in the intact state, TB-reconstructed knee, DB-reconstructed knee, and SB-reconstructed knee. The LMP in each reconstruction was recorded. Each reconstructed knee was tested with an external load of 100-N anterior drawer and combined rotatory loads of 10-Nm valgus moment and 5-Nm internal rotation. The anterior tibial translation and tensile forces of each graft bundle were measured.
Results:
The LMP values for the TB reconstruction were 1.7 N for the anteromedial-medial graft, 1.7 N for the anteromedial-lateral graft, and 3.4 N for the posterolateral graft (PLG). The LMP value was 5.6 N for the anteromedial graft and PLG in the DB reconstruction. The LMP value was 26.3 N for the whole graft in the SB reconstruction. No statistically significant difference in stability was found between TB and DB reconstructions during the anterior load and the combined rotatory load test. For force distribution, the PLG tension in the TB reconstruction was statistically lower than that in the DB reconstruction.
Conclusions:
Anatomic TB ACL reconstruction with the lowest initial tension on the graft stabilized the knee equally to DB or SB reconstruction, which required greater initial tension.
Clinical Relevance:
Although SB, DB, and TB ACL reconstructions through the anatomic tunnel position could equally restore stability, the initial tension on the graft required to restore stability was less in the latter 2 multi-tunnel reconstructions.
More Related Videos
05:07Author Spotlight: Implementing the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Concept in Rehabilitation Following Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Published on: March 1, 2024
05:44Author Spotlight: Double Posteromedial Approach for Treating Posterior Cruciate Ligament Cysts
Published on: October 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Electron Microscope Tomography and Single-particle Reconstruction
Electron Tomography
Electron tomography can be performed either in TEM or STEM (scanning transmission...
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Scalar and Vector Triple Products
The scalar triple product is the dot product of a vector with the cross product of two vectors....
Fixing Double-strand Breaks
Muscles of the Anterior Neck
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...