Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test MSPT: An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Saccadic eye movements are able to reduce body sway in mildly-affected people with Multiple Sclerosis
Felipe Balistieri Santinelli1, Richard E A van Emmerik2, Fabiana Araújo Silva1
1São Paulo State University (UNESP) - Campus Bauru, Human Movement Research Laboratory (MOVI-LAB), Department of Physical Education, Graduate Program in Movement Sciences, Brazil.
Background:
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative and inflammatory disease that impacts both visual and postural control. It is currently unknown how the integration between visual and postural control is affected in people with MS (PwMS). It has been shown in healthy individuals that saccadic eye movements can decrease body sway as result as the integration of eye and postural movements.
Objective:
Investigate the effect of saccadic eye movement on postural control in PwMS and compare with neurologically healthy people.
Methods:
Thirteen mildly affected PwMS (1.53 ± 1.03 on Expanded Disability Status Scale - EDSS) and 12 healthy neurologically people participated in this study. Postural control was assessed on a force platform under two eye movement conditions: fixation on a central target and saccadic eye movement. The dependent variables assessed were the displacement, velocity, root-mean-square (RMS) and area of postural center of pressure and the number, duration, variability, fixations errors and eye response time. A mobile eye tracker was used to record eye movement. Two-way ANOVA (group and eye movement) for postural variables was performed. For the eye variables, one-way ANOVA with factor to group was performed. The p-value was maintained at 0.05 for all statistical analysis and the effect sizes were based on Cohen's d.
Results:
No group or interaction effects (group*eye movement) were found for postural and eye variables. However, the saccadic eye movement attenuated the postural displacement in anteroposterior (AP) direction (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 4.677), RMS AP (p < 0.001, Cohen's d = 4.399) and area (p < 0.013, Cohen's d = 2.163) in comparison with the central fixation condition in both groups. The Cohen's d showed a large effect between groups for fixation errors (d = 0.741).
Conclusion:
Both groups presented similar postural control performance in both eye movement conditions. Moreover, PwMS could attenuate body sway similarly to the control group, showing that the central integration of dynamic eye movements and postural control is preserved in mildly affected PwMS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reduced Mass Coordinates: Isolated Two-body Problem
Multiple Allele Traits
Anatomical Movements
Here are some common anatomical movements:
Flexion and extension motions are in the sagittal (anterior–posterior) plane of motion. These movements take place at the shoulder, hip, elbow, knee, wrist,...
Reducing Line Loss
With a step-up transformer at the source, the voltage is increased, thereby reducing the current in the transmission lines since power loss in...
The Movement of Organelles and Vesicles
Fluid Movement Between Compartments

