Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined with Movement Observation in Cerebral Palsy
Published on: August 9, 2024
Gait analysis for individually tailored interdisciplinary interventions in children with cerebral palsy: a randomized
Helle M Rasmussen1,2, Niels W Pedersen1,2, Søren Overgaard1,2
1The Orthopaedic Research Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Insights
Instrumented gait analysis did not improve gait or function in children with cerebral palsy (CP) compared to usual care. Interventions based on gait analysis showed no significant advantages for these young patients.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Orthopedics
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Cerebral palsy (CP) affects motor function, necessitating interventions to improve gait and daily living.
- Instrumented gait analysis is proposed to guide individualized, interdisciplinary interventions for children with CP.
- Evaluating the effectiveness of gait analysis-based interventions against standard care is crucial for optimizing treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if individualized interdisciplinary interventions guided by instrumented gait analysis are superior to usual care in improving gait and function in children with CP.
- To compare outcomes in gait, walking ability, and patient-reported measures between children with CP receiving gait analysis-based interventions and those receiving usual care.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial was conducted.
- Sixty children with CP (Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I or II) were randomized into two groups: intervention with gait analysis and usual care.
- Outcomes, including gait (Gait Deviation Index), walking, and patient-reported function, were assessed at 52 weeks.
Main Results:
- No significant or clinically relevant differences were observed between the gait analysis intervention group and the usual care group in primary or secondary outcomes.
- The recommended interventions, primarily non-surgical, were applied in 36% to 86% of participants in the intervention group.
- Compliance with recommended interventions following gait analysis was notably low.
Conclusions:
- Instrumented gait analysis-based interventions were not found to be superior to usual care for improving gait, walking, or patient-reported outcomes in young, independently walking children with CP.
- Low compliance to recommended interventions may have impacted the effectiveness of the gait analysis approach.
- Further research may be needed to optimize the application and integration of gait analysis in CP management.
Aim:
To test the hypothesis that improvements in gait and function following individualized interdisciplinary interventions consisting of physical therapy, orthotics, spasticity management, and orthopaedic surgery using instrumented gait analysis are superior to 'usual care' in children with cerebral palsy (CP).
Method:
This was a prospective, single-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial investigating the effectiveness of interventions based on the use of gait analysis. Primary outcome was gait (Gait Deviation Index) and secondary outcomes were walking and patient-reported outcome measures of function, disability, and health-related quality of life. Follow-ups were done at 26 weeks (questionnaires) and at the primary end point of 52 weeks (all outcomes).
Results:
Sixty participants with CP (39 males, 21 females, mean age 6y 10mo, standard deviation 1y 3mo, range 5y-9y 1mo) in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I or II, were randomized to interventions with or without gait analysis. No significant or clinically relevant between-group differences in change scores of the primary or secondary outcomes were found. The recommended categories of interventions were dominated by non-surgical interventions and were applied in 36% to 86% of the participants.
Interpretation:
Interventions using gait analysis were not superior to 'usual care' on gait, walking, or patient-reported outcomes in a sample of relatively young and independently walking children with CP not expected to need surgery.
What This Paper Adds:
Gait analysis in children with cerebral palsy in Gross Motor Function Classification System levels I or II recommends interdisciplinary interventions. Compliance to interventions recommended after gait analysis was low. No statistically significant advantages were identified for the intervention group versus the control group.
More Related Videos
08:26Event-related Potentials During Target-response Tasks to Study Cognitive Processes of Upper Limb Use in Children with Unilateral Cerebral Palsy
Published on: January 11, 2016
08:24Author Spotlight: Exploring the Potential of Massage Therapy in Cerebral Palsy Using Animal Models
Published on: August 11, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Statistical Software for Data Analysis and Clinical Trials
Nursing Interventions I: Taxonomy of Nursing Interventions
A nursing intervention is a treatment or action based on scientific concepts and knowledge from the nursing, behavioral, and physical sciences. Identifying and prioritizing nursing interventions based on the desired outcome...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...