Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Surgical Bone Implantation Technique for Rat Tibia Models of Diabetes and Osteoporosis
Published on: July 5, 2024
Three-Year Clinical and Audiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Implants for Bone Conduction Devices: Comparison
Ivo J Kruyt1, Herman Kok, Arjan Bosman
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Donders Center for Neurosciences, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Objectives:
To evaluate the three-year clinical and audiological outcomes of soft-tissue preservation compared to soft-tissue reduction in linear incision surgery for percutaneous implant for bone conduction (BC) devices.
Methods:
Twenty-five patients (25 implants) were enrolled in a prospective cohort for implant surgery with linear incision and tissue preservation. The control group consisted of 25 patients (25 implants) from a previous randomized controlled trial in which a linear incision with soft-tissue reduction was applied. Follow-up visits were scheduled at 7 and 21 days (fitting of sound processor); 12 weeks; 6 months; and at 1, 2, and 3 years after implantation. Main outcome measures were skin sensibility, soft-tissue status, Implant Stability Quotient (ISQ), skin height, implant survival, revision surgery, scar assessment, and hearing thresholds (BC in-situ between 250 Hz and 8 kHz with BC device on testband and abutment, and BC thresholds at 250Hz-4 kHz with a B71 bone conductor).
Results:
Tissue preservation resulted in superior sensibility (mean percentage correct responses 99.7% [SD 1.7] vs 92.0% [SD 9.2], p = 0.0001). No spontaneous implant loss occurred in either group. The abutment was removed in two tests and in one control patient. Two control patients needed skin revision surgery. Although not statistically significant, more adverse soft-tissue reactions (Holgers ≥2) were observed in the test-group (n = 9 [36%] vs n = 3 [12%], p = 0.095). ISQ increased significantly more in the test group compared to the control group (7.64 [SD 4.05] vs 4.29 [SD 3.93]). Skin thickening, scar assessment, and hearing outcomes were comparable.
Conclusion:
Tissue preservation demonstrated superior skin sensibility compared to tissue reduction while other clinical outcomes were comparably excellent.
Related Concept Videos
Bone Cells and Tissue
Osteoblasts and Osteocytes
The osteoblast is the bone cell responsible for forming new bone tissue. It is found in the growing portions of bone, including the...
Hormones and Bone Tissue
Hormones That Influence Osteoblasts and/or Maintain the Matrix
Several hormones are necessary for controlling bone growth and maintaining the bone matrix. The pituitary gland secretes growth hormone (GH), which, as its name implies, controls bone growth. This happens in several ways: first, it triggers chondrocyte...
Growth of Cartilage and Bone Tissue
Bone as Supporting Connective Tissue
Bone Matrix
Bone, or osseous tissue, is a connective tissue that has a large amount of two different types of matrix material. The organic matrix is similar to the matrix material found in other connective tissues, including some amount of collagen and elastic fibers. This gives strength and flexibility to the tissue. The inorganic matrix consists of mineral salts— mostly calcium salts—...
Tissues
Tissues

