Damage indices in rheumatic diseases: A systematic review of the literature
N Ferdowsi1, W Stevens2, M Baron3
1The University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia; St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Insights
Seven composite disease damage indices exist for rheumatic diseases, but only two meet all validation criteria. This review informs future index development, particularly for systemic sclerosis (SSc).
Area of Science:
- Rheumatology
- Clinical Epidemiology
- Health Outcomes Research
Background:
- Disease damage indices are crucial for assessing long-term outcomes in rheumatic diseases.
- Evaluating the psychometric properties of these indices ensures their reliability and validity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review existing literature on disease damage indices in rheumatic diseases.
- To assess the psychometric properties of identified indices using the OMERACT filter.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library up to June 2018.
- Inclusion of composite (multi-organ) indices with detailed methodology.
- Validation assessment using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) filter.
Main Results:
- Seven composite disease damage indices were identified across five rheumatic diseases.
- Forty-eight articles focused on the validation of these indices.
- Variable validation levels were observed, with only two indices meeting all OMERACT criteria.
Conclusions:
- Seven composite disease damage indices have been developed for various rheumatic diseases, excluding systemic sclerosis (SSc).
- The findings provide methodological insights for developing a disease damage index in SSc.
Objective:
To review the current literature, and evaluate the psychometric properties of disease damage indices in rheumatic diseases.
Methods:
A search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases was performed to June 2018 to identify damage indices in all systemic rheumatic diseases. Articles were included in a systematic review if indices were composite (multi-organ) in nature and if adequate detail on methodology was described. Articles pertaining to the validation of these indices were also reviewed in order to assess the psychometric properties of the indices using the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) filter as a guide.
Results:
Of the 2659 articles retrieved through the search, we identified 7 damage indices in five diseases: idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, systemic lupus erythematosus, systemic vasculitis, Sjӧgren's syndrome and antiphospholipid syndrome. A further 48 articles were identified pertaining to the validation of these damage indices. The methodological process for the development of these indices included expert consensus, item reduction and item weighting methods. The level of validation that these indices have achieved is variable, with only 2 damage indices fulfilling all criteria of the OMERACT filter.
Conclusions:
To date, there have been 7 composite disease damage indices created in a variety of rheumatic diseases, with the exception of systemic sclerosis (SSc). This review has informed methodology for the development of a disease damage index in SSc.
Related Concept Videos
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management
Indicators
Rheumatic Heart Disease III: Medical Management
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...


