Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

07:07
Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
9.2K
A margin for error in grasping: hand pre-shaping takes into account task-dependent changes in the probability of
Bruce D Keefe1, Pierre-Arthur Suray1, Simon J Watt2
1School of Psychology, Bangor University, Penrallt Rd., Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2AS, UK.
Experimental Brain Research
|February 13, 2019
Summary
Grasping movements adjust hand opening based on task difficulty and visual uncertainty. This study shows the brain actively controls error probability by considering the
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Motor Control
- Human-Computer Interaction
Background:
- Grasping movements require balancing success probability with movement costs under uncertainty.
- It is assumed that error probability is managed by adjusting a margin for error in hand opening.
- The brain must estimate uncertainty and compute how movement alterations affect error probability (the 'probability landscape').
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if grasping movements are sensitive to the probability landscape.
- To investigate if the brain actively controls error probability during grasping tasks.
- To test the margin-for-error account of grasping under varying uncertainty.
Main Methods:
- Subjects performed three grasping tasks with distinct probability landscapes.
- Visual uncertainty was manipulated by blurring vision and monocular occlusion.
- Movements were executed without visual feedback to isolate initial object property estimation uncertainty.
Main Results:
- Changes in hand opening under increased visual uncertainty aligned with predictions from the margin-for-error account.
- Different grasping tasks exhibited qualitatively different responses to uncertainty.
- Grasping movements demonstrated sensitivity to the probability landscape.
Conclusions:
- Grasping movements are sensitive to the probability landscape, supporting the margin-for-error hypothesis.
- The brain actively controls error probability by adjusting movement parameters.
- Findings support the intuitive notion of a true margin-for-error mechanism in grasping.
Related Concept Videos
Margin of Error
7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K
Fundamental Attribution Error
13.8K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.8K
Random Error
9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Standard Error of the Mean
12.4K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.4K
Contaminants and Errors
371
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
371

