Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

In Vitro Method to Study Sex-Based Differences in Conjunctival Goblet Cells
Published on: July 28, 2023
Phenotypic differences in early outgrowth angiogenic cells based on in vitro cultivation
Tyler D Bammert1, Collin A Beckstrom1, Grace Lincenberg1
1Integrative Vascular Biology Laboratory, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.
Abstract:
Bone marrow-derived early outgrowth cells play an important role in endothelial repair. In vitro isolation techniques have identified two distinct morphological early outgrowth cell populations, but it is still unknown whether they present some functional phenotypic differences. Accordingly, the aim of the present study was to determine whether there are phenotypic differences in cellular function between two putative early outgrowth cells in culture. Peripheral blood samples were collected from 18 healthy adults. Thereafter, mononuclear cells were isolated by Ficoll density-gradient centrifugation and plated on 6-well plates coated with human fibronectin. After 2 and 7 days, respectively, non-adherent cells (NAC) and adherent cells (AC) underwent functional assays in order to measure the migratory capacity (Boyden chamber), angiogenic growth factor release (ELISA) and apoptosis (TUNEL). Migration to both VEGF (517 ± 74 vs. 273 ± 74 AU) and SDF-1 (517 ± 68 vs. 232 ± 68 AU) were approximately twofold higher (P < 0.05) in the NAC when compared to AC. Release of angiogenic factors, granulocyte colony-stimulating and hepatocyte growth factor, were not different between cell types. Apoptotic response to staurosporine was significantly lower in NAC (20 ± 32 vs. 125 ± 32%). In summary, NAC and AC demonstrated functional phenotypic differences in migratory capacity and apoptotic susceptibility, which makes it difficult to compare these two early outgrowth cell populations in literature.
More Related Videos
13:36Author Spotlight: Dendritic Cells Maturation Using Sialidases-Based Enzymatic Treatment of the Cell Surface
Published on: October 20, 2023
10:47Standardized and Scalable Assay to Study Perfused 3D Angiogenic Sprouting of iPSC-derived Endothelial Cells In Vitro
Published on: November 6, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Electric Potential and Potential Difference
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Sum and Difference OpAmps
A summing amplifier, or an adder, utilizes an op-amp to merge multiple input signals into a single output signal. When audio signals are introduced into its input channels, the input resistors initiate currents that traverse feedback resistors, resulting in an output voltage. Applying Kirchhoff's current...
Difference Equation Solution using z-Transform
The z-transform facilitates handling delayed signals by shifting the signal in the z-domain, which corresponds to delaying the signal in the time domain, and advancing signals by similarly shifting in the...
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...