Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

33.1K
Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
33.1K
DNA Base Pairing02:27

DNA Base Pairing

32.2K
32.2K
Base-pairing and DNA Repair02:27

Base-pairing and DNA Repair

93.3K
93.3K
Relative Strengths of Conjugate Acid-Base Pairs02:29

Relative Strengths of Conjugate Acid-Base Pairs

52.3K
Brønsted-Lowry acid-base chemistry is the transfer of protons; thus, logic suggests a relation between the relative strengths of conjugate acid-base pairs. The strength of an acid or base is quantified in its ionization constant, Ka or Kb, which represents the extent of the acid or base ionization reaction. For the conjugate acid-base pair HA / A−, the ionization equilibrium equations and ionization constant expressions are
52.3K
VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs04:01

VSEPR Theory and the Effect of Lone Pairs

53.0K
Effect of Lone Pairs of Electrons on Molecule Geometry
53.0K
VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes02:52

VSEPR Theory and the Basic Shapes

84.4K
Overview of VSEPR Theory
84.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correlative Multimodal Framework Reveals Supramolecular Chirality Loss Preceding Fibrillar Rarefaction in Dermal Collagen.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Multifocal Neuroblastoma in Rubinstein-Taybi Syndrome Harboring a Novel CREBBP Variant Identified by Paired Whole Genome Sequencing.

Congenital anomalies·2026
Same author

Coats-like exudative vasculopathy in a patient with Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

American journal of ophthalmology case reports·2026
Same author

Hollow-needle-like nanocarbon with chirality-discriminating inner walls.

Nanoscale·2026
Same author

Comparison of oncological outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries for gastric cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study in Japan.

Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association·2026
Same author

Aberrant Splicing From an HDAC8 Intronic Variant c.112-15C>A Causes Familial Cornelia de Lange Syndrome in Heterozygous and Hemizygous Individuals.

Congenital anomalies·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Drug Treatment and In Vivo Imaging of Osteoblast-Osteoclast Interactions in a Medaka Fish Osteoporosis Model
08:53

Drug Treatment and In Vivo Imaging of Osteoblast-Osteoclast Interactions in a Medaka Fish Osteoporosis Model

Published on: January 1, 2017

9.7K

Trans-pairing between osteoclasts and osteoblasts shapes the cranial base during development.

Mio Edamoto1, Yukiko Kuroda1, Masaki Yoda1

  • 1Laboratory of Cell and Tissue Biology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.

Scientific Reports
|February 15, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Mechanical stress from brain growth guides bone remodeling. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts coordinate to shape the basioccipital bone, ensuring proper cranial base development.

More Related Videos

A RANKL-based Osteoclast Culture Assay of Mouse Bone Marrow to Investigate the Role of mTORC1 in Osteoclast Formation
09:37

A RANKL-based Osteoclast Culture Assay of Mouse Bone Marrow to Investigate the Role of mTORC1 in Osteoclast Formation

Published on: March 15, 2018

14.4K
Effect of Anti-c-fms Antibody on Osteoclast Formation and Proliferation of Osteoclast Precursor In Vitro
07:51

Effect of Anti-c-fms Antibody on Osteoclast Formation and Proliferation of Osteoclast Precursor In Vitro

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Drug Treatment and In Vivo Imaging of Osteoblast-Osteoclast Interactions in a Medaka Fish Osteoporosis Model
08:53

Drug Treatment and In Vivo Imaging of Osteoblast-Osteoclast Interactions in a Medaka Fish Osteoporosis Model

Published on: January 1, 2017

9.7K
A RANKL-based Osteoclast Culture Assay of Mouse Bone Marrow to Investigate the Role of mTORC1 in Osteoclast Formation
09:37

A RANKL-based Osteoclast Culture Assay of Mouse Bone Marrow to Investigate the Role of mTORC1 in Osteoclast Formation

Published on: March 15, 2018

14.4K
Effect of Anti-c-fms Antibody on Osteoclast Formation and Proliferation of Osteoclast Precursor In Vitro
07:51

Effect of Anti-c-fms Antibody on Osteoclast Formation and Proliferation of Osteoclast Precursor In Vitro

Published on: March 18, 2019

6.3K

Area of Science:

  • Developmental biology
  • Biomechanics
  • Craniofacial development

Background:

  • Bone development, particularly the cranial base, is influenced by the expansion of surrounding organs like the brain.
  • Understanding the mechanisms that link organ growth to bone morphology is crucial for comprehending craniofacial development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the mechanisms underlying morphological changes in the mouse clivus (basioccipital bone) in response to brain enlargement.
  • To define how mechanical stress influences bone remodeling during cranial base development.

Main Methods:

  • Histological analysis of mouse basioccipital bone to examine osteoclast and osteoblast distribution.
  • Finite element analysis to map mechanical stress (compression and tension) on the clivus.
  • Developmental analysis comparing wild-type mice with Tnfsf11-/- mice lacking osteoclasts.

Main Results:

  • Osteoclasts were located dorsally and osteoblasts ventrally on the basioccipital bone, corresponding to areas of compression and tension, respectively.
  • Osteoclastic bone resorption occurred in compressed areas, while bone formation occurred in tension areas.
  • The clivus angle was less pronounced in mice lacking osteoclasts, indicating their role in shaping the bone.

Conclusions:

  • Mechanical stresses, specifically compression and tension, dictate the localization of osteoclasts and osteoblasts.
  • Osteoclast-osteoblast interaction across cortical bone, induced by mechanical stress from growing organs, regulates the shape and size of brain-encasing bones.