Can EEG Predict Response to Atomoxetine in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder at 1 Week?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Gurmukh Singh1, Priti Arun1, Subhash Das1
1Government Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh, India.
Insights
Electroencephalography (EEG) changes at 1 week can predict treatment response in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Decreased theta cordance values indicate likely positive response to atomoxetine therapy.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Child Psychiatry
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder in children.
- Atomoxetine is a commonly prescribed medication for ADHD.
- Predicting treatment response early can optimize therapeutic outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate early electroencephalography (EEG) changes after 1 week of atomoxetine treatment in children with ADHD.
- To correlate these early EEG changes with clinical response at 6 weeks.
- To identify potential biomarkers for predicting atomoxetine efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Fifty children (6-14 years) diagnosed with ADHD according to DSM-5 criteria participated.
- Clinical response was assessed using Vanderbilt ADHD Parent and Teacher Rating Scales (VADPRS/VADTRS) at baseline and at 1, 4, and 6 weeks.
- Electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded at baseline and 1 week post-treatment using the International 10-20 System.
Main Results:
- Patients were categorized as responders or non-responders based on clinical scales.
- Responders showed a significant decrease in theta cordance values after 1 week of atomoxetine.
- Non-responders did not exhibit a significant decrease in theta cordance values.
Conclusions:
- Decreased theta cordance values at 1 week predict a positive clinical response to atomoxetine in children with ADHD.
- Specifically, changes in the left temporoparietal region are indicative of response.
- This EEG marker may aid in early identification of non-responders, allowing for timely treatment adjustments.
Abstract:
Objective: The objective of the study is to predict the early changes in electroencephalography (EEG) at 1 week and its correlation to clinical response at 6 weeks after treatment with atomoxetine in children with ADHD. Method: In 50 children (6-14 years) with ADHD (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [5th ed.; DSM-5]), Vanderbilt ADHD Parent Rating Scale (VADPRS) and Vanderbilt ADHD Teachers Rating Scale (VADTRS) were applied at baseline, 1, 4, and 6 weeks. EEG was recorded using International 10-20 System of electrode placement at baseline and at 1 week after atomoxetine treatment. EEG changes at 1 week after atomoxetine therapy was correlated to clinical response at 6 weeks. Results: Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders based on the VADPRS/VADTRS findings. After 1 week of treatment, responders' theta cordance values were decreased, whereas nonresponders' values didn't decrease significantly. Conclusion: Patients with decreased theta cordance values, especially in the left temporoparietal region, at 1 week were likely to respond to atomoxetine while those without any such change were likely to be nonresponders.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
13:09Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Predicting Products: SN1 vs. SN2
With increased substitution on the alkyl halide,...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Intrinsically Disordered Proteins
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
End Point Prediction: Gran Plot
For potentiometric titration, the Gran plot is created by plotting...