Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Protocols for C-Brick DNA Standard Assembly Using Cpf1
Published on: June 15, 2017
Negative reciprocity, not ordered assembly, underlies the interaction of Sox2 and Oct4 on DNA
John W Biddle1, Maximilian Nguyen1, Jeremy Gunawardena1
1Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Abstract:
The mode of interaction of transcription factors (TFs) on eukaryotic genomes remains a matter of debate. Single-molecule data in living cells for the TFs Sox2 and Oct4 were previously interpreted as evidence of ordered assembly on DNA. However, the quantity that was calculated does not determine binding order but, rather, energy expenditure away from thermodynamic equilibrium. Here, we undertake a rigorous biophysical analysis which leads to the concept of reciprocity. The single-molecule data imply that Sox2 and Oct4 exhibit negative reciprocity, with expression of Sox2 increasing Oct4's genomic binding but expression of Oct4 decreasing Sox2's binding. Models show that negative reciprocity can arise either from energy expenditure or from a mixture of positive and negative cooperativity at distinct genomic loci. Both possibilities imply unexpected complexity in how TFs interact on DNA, for which single-molecule methods provide novel detection capabilities.
Related Concept Videos
Negative Regulator Molecules
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity
Predator-Prey Interactions
Positive, Negative, and Zero Work
From DNA to Protein
Protein Complex Assembly
Many viruses self-assemble into a fully functional unit using the infected host cell to...

