Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

A Method for Screening and Validation of Resistant Mutations Against Kinase Inhibitors
Published on: December 7, 2014
Validating a method to assess disease burden from insurance claims
Thomas E Kottke1, Jason M Gallagher, Marcia Lowry
1HealthPartners, 8170 33rd Ave S, MS 21110X, Minneapolis, MN 55425.
Estimating disease burden using disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) from insurance claims is a valid method for identifying health conditions impacting insured populations. This approach helps pinpoint areas for improved health outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Estimating disease burden is crucial for resource allocation in healthcare.
- Traditional methods may not fully capture the impact on insured populations.
- Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) offer a comprehensive measure of disease impact.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate a method for estimating disease burden using DALYs.
- To utilize insurance claims and death records for burden estimation.
- To identify conditions with the greatest disease burden in an insured population.
Main Methods:
- Compared DALYs from claims/death records with self-reported health status.
- Included individuals with commercial insurance products who completed health assessments.
- Employed Spearman's rank-order correlation (ρ) to assess relationships.
Main Results:
- DALYs showed significant negative correlations with self-reported function (ρ ≈ -0.23) and health (ρ ≈ -0.19).
- These correlations were comparable in magnitude to those for the number of medical conditions per member.
- DALY correlations with function and health were stronger than correlations with claims cost.
Conclusions:
- DALYs calculated from insurance claims and death records are a valid tool.
- This method is cost-effective for identifying high-burden conditions.
- Health plans can use this approach to understand and address population health needs.
Related Concept Videos
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...
Reliability and Validity
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...
Testing a Claim about Mean: Unknown Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be approximately normally distributed. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. There is no specific requirement for sample size. But if the sample size is less than 30, and we don't know the population standard deviation, a different approach is used;...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:

