Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Implantation of Human-Sized Coronary Stents into Rat Abdominal Aorta Using a Trans-Femoral Access
Published on: November 19, 2020
Developing and Testing a Personalized, Evidence-Based, Shared Decision-Making Tool for Stent Selection in
Adnan K Chhatriwalla1,2, Carole Decker1,2, Elizabeth Gialde1
1Division of Cardiology, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, MO (A.K.C., C.D., E.G., K.J., P.J., J.A.S.).
Insights
Shared decision-making tools for drug-eluting stents improve patient knowledge but require coaching. The tool alone did not impact stent selection, indicating potential physician-level barriers to shared decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
- Patient Decision Making
Background:
- Drug-eluting stents (DES) reduce restenosis but necessitate prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, increasing bleeding risk and costs.
- Physician discussion of stent options with patients is infrequent, despite high DES utilization.
- Shared decision-making (SDM) aims to improve patient involvement in treatment choices.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of an individualized shared decision-making (SDM) tool for coronary stent selection.
- To assess the impact of the SDM tool, with and without decision coaching, on patient knowledge, participation, and stent preference.
Main Methods:
- An SDM tool for stent selection was implemented in two US hospitals.
- Patients received the SDM tool with or without decision coaching from a nurse.
- Patient knowledge, SDM participation, stent preference, and stent selection concordance were assessed via interviews.
Main Results:
- SDM tool with coaching significantly improved patient knowledge (mean difference +1.8) and SDM participation (OR=2.96).
- Patients receiving coaching were more likely to state a stent preference (OR=2.00).
- The SDM tool, with or without coaching, did not impact stent selection or the concordance between patient preference and received stent.
Conclusions:
- An SDM tool enhances patient knowledge and participation in stent selection when combined with decision coaching.
- Physician-level barriers may hinder the impact of SDM tools on actual stent selection and preference concordance.
- Further research is needed to address systemic barriers to effective SDM in percutaneous coronary intervention.
Abstract:
Background Drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, but their use necessitates prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy, which increases costs and bleeding risk, and which may delay elective surgeries. While >80% of patients in the United States receive drug-eluting stents, less than a third report that their physicians discussed options with them. Methods and Results An individualized shared decision-making (SDM) tool for stent selection was designed and implemented at 2 US hospitals. In the postimplementation phase, all patients received the SDM tool before their procedure, with or without decision coaching from a trained nurse. All patients were interviewed with respect to their knowledge of stents, their participation in SDM, and their stent preference. Between May 2014 and December 2016, 332 patients not receiving the SDM tool, 113 receiving the SDM tool with coaching, and 136 receiving the tool without coaching were interviewed. Patients receiving the SDM tool + coaching, as compared with usual care, demonstrated higher knowledge scores (mean difference +1.8; P<0.001), reported more frequent participation in SDM (odds ratio=2.96; P<0.001), and were more likely to state a stent preference (odds ratio=2.00; P<0.001). No significant differences were observed between the use of the SDM tool without coaching and usual care. For patients who voiced a stent preference, concordance between stent desired and stent received was 98% for patients who preferred a drug-eluting stent and 50% for patients who preferred a bare metal stent. The SDM tool (with or without coaching) had no impact on stent selection or concordance. Conclusions An SDM tool for stent selection was associated with improvements in patient knowledge and SDM only when accompanied by decision coaching. However, the SDM tool (with or without coaching) had no impact on stent selection or concordance between patients' stent preference and stent received, suggesting that physician-level barriers to SDM may exist. Clinical Trial Information URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique Identifier: NCT02046902.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
The Evidence for Evolution
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...

