Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
Regression Toward the Mean01:52

Regression Toward the Mean

Regression toward the mean (“RTM”) is a phenomenon in which extremely high or low values—for example, and individual’s blood pressure at a particular moment—appear closer to a group’s average upon remeasuring. Although this statistical peculiarity is the result of random error and chance, it has been problematic across various medical, scientific, financial and psychological applications. In particular, RTM, if not taken into account, can interfere when researchers try to extrapolate results...
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring01:24

Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring

Self-monitoring is a central construct in understanding individual differences in self-presentation strategies across social contexts. It refers to how individuals observe, regulate, and control their expressive behavior and self-presentation following situational cues. Self-monitoring reflects a person's sensitivity to social appropriateness and willingness to adapt behavior to fit varying interpersonal demands.High vs. Low Self-Monitoring IndividualsIndividuals high in self-monitoring are...
Actor-Observer Effect01:23

Actor-Observer Effect

The actor-observer effect, a cognitive bias closely linked to the fundamental attribution error, refers to the tendency for individuals to attribute their behavior to external, situational factors while explaining others’ behavior in terms of internal, dispositional traits. This asymmetry in attribution significantly influences social perception and judgment.Cognitive Mechanisms Behind the EffectTwo primary psychological mechanisms contribute to the actor-observer effect: differences in visual...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconciling Signal-Detection Models of Criterion Learning with the Generalized Matching Law.

Computational brain & behavior·2026
Same author

Deliberation in Guesstimation.

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Connecting process models to response times through Bayesian hierarchical regression analysis.

Behavior research methods·2024
Same author

Solving Bongard Problems With a Visual Language and Pragmatic Constraints.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Influence of reinforcement and its omission on trial-by-trial changes of response bias in perceptual decision making.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2024
Same author

Auditory cortex reflects goal-directed movement but is not necessary for behavioral adaptation in sound-cued reward tracking.

Journal of neurophysiology·2020

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Measurement of Carotenoids in Perifovea using the Macular Pigment Reflectometer
09:35

Measurement of Carotenoids in Perifovea using the Macular Pigment Reflectometer

Published on: January 29, 2020

Descending Marr's levels: Standard observers are no panacea.

Carlos Zednik1, Frank Jäkel2

  • 1Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg,D-39016 Magdeburg,Germany.carlos.zednik@ovgu.dehttps://sites.google.com/site/czednik/.

The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|February 16, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Standard observer models are insufficient for explaining perceptual behavior. A multi-level analysis is needed, considering optimality and alternative algorithmic hypotheses beyond just standard models.

More Related Videos

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter
05:10

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Published on: February 18, 2021

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice
04:14

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice

Published on: November 22, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2026

Measurement of Carotenoids in Perifovea using the Macular Pigment Reflectometer
09:35

Measurement of Carotenoids in Perifovea using the Macular Pigment Reflectometer

Published on: January 29, 2020

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter
05:10

Measuring the Behavioral Effects of Intraocular Scatter

Published on: February 18, 2021

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice
04:14

Observational Fear as a Model of Affective Empathy in Mice

Published on: November 22, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Perception

Background:

  • Marr's framework emphasizes multiple levels of analysis for perceptual behavior.
  • Rahnev & Denison (R&D) critique existing models but may overlook key aspects.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the sufficiency of standard observer models in explaining perception.
  • To advocate for a broader approach incorporating computational and algorithmic levels.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of perceptual modeling frameworks.
  • Critique of optimality considerations and standard observer assumptions.

Main Results:

  • Standard observer models alone are inadequate for comprehensive explanations.
  • Over-reliance on these models can neglect alternative algorithmic hypotheses.

Conclusions:

  • Perceptual explanations require a multi-level approach, integrating computational optimality and diverse algorithmic models.
  • Standard observer modeling is not a universal solution for understanding perception.