Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Author Spotlight: Biological Standardization to Ensure Reproducibility and Harmonization in Research
Published on: August 4, 2023
The standard Bayesian model is normatively invalid for biological brains
Rani Moran1, Konstantinos Tsetsos2
1Max Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research,University College London,London WC1B 5EH,United Kingdom.rani.moran@gmail.comhttps://www.mps-ucl-centre.mpg.de/en/people/rani-moran.
Abstract:
We show that the benchmark Bayesian framework that Rahnev & Denison (R&D) used to assess optimality is actually suboptimal under realistic assumptions about how noise corrupts decision making in biological brains. This model is therefore invalid qua normative standard. We advise against generally forsaking optimality and argue that a biologically constrained definition of optimality could serve as an important driver for scientific progress.
Related Concept Videos
What is Conservation Biology?
Biological Effects of Radiation
Standard Enthalpy of Formation
Standard Electrode Potentials
Measurement: Standard Units
Calculating Standard Free Energy Changes

