Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

On-Site Molecular Detection of Soil-Borne Phytopathogens Using a Portable Real-Time PCR System
Published on: February 23, 2018
Conical intersections and nonadiabatic coupling terms in 1,3,5-C6H3F3 +: A six state beyond Born-Oppenheimer
Soumya Mukherjee1, Joy Dutta1, Bijit Mukherjee1
1School of Chemical Sciences, Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, India.
Abstract:
In order to circumvent numerical inaccuracy originating from the singularity of nonadiabatic coupling terms (NACTs), we need to perform kinetically coupled adiabatic to potentially coupled diabatic transformation of the nuclear Schrödinger Equation. Such a transformation is difficult to achieve for higher dimensional sub-Hilbert spaces due to inherent complicacy of adiabatic to diabatic transformation (ADT) equations. Nevertheless, detailed expressions of ADT equations are formulated for six coupled electronic states for the first time and their validity is extensively examined for a well-known radical cation, namely, 1,3,5-C6H3F3 + (TFBZ+). While implementing this formulation, we compute ab initio adiabatic potential energy surfaces (PESs) and NACTs within the low-lying six electronic states (X̃2E'', Ã2A2 '', B̃2E', and C̃2A2 '), where several types of nonadiabatic interactions, like Jahn-Teller conical intersections (CI), accidental CIs, accidental seams (series of degenerate points), and pseudo Jahn-Teller interactions can be observed over the Franck-Condon region of nuclear configuration space. Those interactions are depicted by exploring degenerate components of C-C asymmetric stretching, C-C symmetric stretching, and C-C-C scissoring motion (Q9x, Q9y, Q10x, Q10y, Q12x, and Q12y) to compute complete active space self-consistent field level adiabatic PESs and NACTs as implemented in the MOLPRO quantum chemistry package. Subsequently, we perform the ADT using our newly devised fifteen (15) ADT equations to locate the position of CIs, verify the quantization of NACTs, and to construct highly accurate diabatic PESs.
Related Concept Videos
The Born-Haber Cycle
Polar Equations of Conics
Long-term Depression
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
G-protein Coupled Receptors

