Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 29, 2026

Gene-environment Interaction Models to Unmask Susceptibility Mechanisms in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: January 7, 2014
Consideration of Nonparametric Approaches for Assessing Genotype-by-Environment (G × E) Interaction with Disease
L V Madden1, P A Paul1, P E Lipps1
1Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, Ohio Agricultural and Research Development Center (OARDC), Wooster 44691.
Abstract:
Determination of host genotype-by-environment (G × E) interaction is needed to assess the stability of cultivar traits such as plant disease resistance and to reveal differences in aggressiveness or virulence of pathogen strains among locations. Here we explored the use of rank-based methodology to quantify the concordance (or discordance) of disease responses of host genotypes across environments, based on the Kendall coefficient of concordance (W) and ancillary test statistics, in order to determine the extent to which environment affected rankings of genotypes. An analysis of four data sets for disease severity of gray leaf spot of maize (with genotypes planted in as many as 11 locations in a given year) revealed highly significant concordance (P ≤ 0.001) overall, indicating that genotypes varied little in within-environment rankings. This suggests that the G × E interaction was small or nonexistent (in terms of rankings). A novel rank-based method by Piepho was evaluated to further elucidate the interaction (if any) through a test for variance homogeneity. The Piepho test statistic was not significant (P > 0.25) for any of the gray leaf spot data sets, confirming the stability of genotypes across environments for this pathosystem; however, analysis of published data sets for other pathosystems indicated significant results. The relationship shown by Hühn, Lotito, and Piepho between the ratio of genotype and residual variances of the original data and the rank-based W statistic was evaluated using Monte Carlo simulations. A more general functional relationship was developed that is applicable over a wide range of number of genotypes and environments in the analyzed studies. This confirms previously shown linkages between rankings of genotypes within environments and variability in the original (unranked) data, thus permitting ease of interpretation of parametric and nonparametric results.
Related Concept Videos
Gene-Environment Interactions
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance,...
Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics
One of...
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems...
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Compartment Models
Two primary types of compartment models are recognized: mammillary and catenary. The more...

