Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty performed by trainees

To assess the surgical outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) performed by trainees.

Retrospective, case control comparative study.

This study compared cases performed by trainees with those performed by an experienced surgeon. First 10 cases of DSAEK performed by trainees with more than 6 months follow-up periods were recruited. The surgical outcomes of DSAEK performed by the trainees (Trainee group) were compared with disease-matched pairs of cases performed by an experienced surgeon (Experienced group). Graft clarity, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, corneal endothelial cell density, and incidence of intra- or post-operative complications were studied.

Forty-one pairs were recruited. The graft clarity rate was not different between the Trainee and Experienced groups, with 95.1% and 97.6%, respectively, maintaining clear grafts at 12 months postoperatively. Trainee best spectacle corrected visual acuity was significantly worse at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with the Experienced group, and percent decreases in corneal endothelial density was more in the Trainee group at 3 months following surgery (P = 0.0029). While intra- or late post-operative complication rates were similar in both groups, incidences of early post-operative complications such as double chamber formation or pupillary block were observed more frequently in the Trainee group than in the Experienced group (P = 0.049).

DSAEK can be performed relatively safely by training physicians with careful preparation and supervision by attending physicians. However, careful case selection and education on management of air injected in the anterior chamber seemed to be a key to long-term success.