Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis
Cell Motility through Blebbing
Energy to Drive Translocation
Actin and Myosin in Muscle Contraction
Overview of Myosin Structure and Function
Role of Myosin in Cell Migration
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Micro-drive Array for Chronic in vivo Recording: Drive Fabrication
Published on: April 20, 2009
Nilay Taneja1, Dylan T Burnette1
1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232.
Membrane blebs are temporary structures that form during cell division and migration. These structures go through three phases: nucleation, growth, and retraction. Bleb retraction happens when the actin cortex pulls the bleb back into the cell. Nonmuscle myosin II (MII) is involved in this process. Mammalian cells have three MII isoforms: MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC. This study found that MIIA is the only isoform responsible for bleb retraction during cell division. The motor domain and a specific region of MIIA’s structure are both needed for this process. The study also found that MIIA turnover at the cell cortex is linked to more efficient bleb retraction. These findings clarify the unique role of MIIA in this cellular process.
Area of Science:
Background:
Membrane blebs form during various cellular processes, including division and migration. These structures arise when the plasma membrane detaches from the underlying actin cortex. Bleb formation involves three distinct phases: nucleation, growth, and retraction. During retraction, the actin cortex reassembles and pulls the bleb back into the cell. Nonmuscle myosin II (MII) is known to play a role in this process. Three MII paralogues—MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC—are present in mammalian cells, each with unique properties. Prior research has shown that MII contributes to cortical reassembly and bleb retraction. However, the specific role of each MII isoform in bleb dynamics remains unclear. This gap motivated investigations into which MII paralogue is responsible for bleb retraction. Understanding this distinction could clarify how different MII isoforms contribute to cell division and motility.
Purpose Of The Study:
This study aimed to determine which MII isoform is specifically involved in bleb retraction during cytokinesis. The researchers focused on MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC, testing their roles in bleb dynamics. The goal was to identify the specific MII paralogue that drives bleb retraction. The team also sought to understand how MIIA functions in this process. They examined whether the motor domain or the nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA is necessary for bleb retraction. The study aimed to clarify the relationship between MIIA turnover and bleb retraction. This work addresses a key question in cytoskeletal mechanics: which MII isoform is essential for bleb retraction. The findings could help distinguish the functional roles of MII paralogues in cellular processes.
Main Methods:
The researchers used live-cell imaging to observe bleb dynamics in mammalian cells. They employed CRISPR-based gene editing to selectively knock out MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC. Fluorescent tagging allowed tracking of MII isoform localization during bleb retraction. The team measured bleb retraction rates in cells lacking specific MII isoforms. They also tested the effects of disrupting the motor domain or the nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA. Cortical turnover of MIIA was quantified using time-lapse imaging. The experiments compared bleb retraction in control cells and cells with MII isoform knockouts. These methods enabled the researchers to identify MIIA as the driver of bleb retraction.
Main Results:
MIIA was found to be specifically responsible for bleb retraction during cytokinesis. Cells lacking MIIA showed significantly reduced bleb retraction. MIIB and MIIC did not compensate for the loss of MIIA. The motor domain of MIIA is necessary for bleb retraction. The nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA also contributes to its function. Faster turnover of MIIA at the cortex correlates with more efficient bleb retraction. Bleb retraction was not observed in MIIA-deficient cells. These findings indicate that MIIA has a unique role in this process.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that MIIA is uniquely required for bleb retraction during cytokinesis. Their findings suggest that neither MIIB nor MIIC can substitute for MIIA in this process. The motor domain and nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA both contribute to its function. Faster MIIA turnover at the cortex is associated with more effective bleb retraction. These results clarify the distinct roles of MII isoforms in cellular mechanics. The study provides evidence that MIIA is specifically involved in bleb retraction. The authors suggest that MIIA’s unique properties make it well-suited for this role. These findings may help explain how different MII isoforms contribute to cell division.
The researchers found that MIIA is specifically responsible for bleb retraction during cytokinesis.
The nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA contributes to its ability to drive bleb retraction.
The motor domain of MIIA is required for bleb retraction, as its disruption prevents this process.
Faster turnover of MIIA at the cortex correlates with more efficient bleb retraction.
Bleb retraction is significantly reduced in cells lacking MIIA.
The study found that MIIB and MIIC do not compensate for the loss of MIIA in bleb retraction.