Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis01:16

Clot Retraction and Fibrinolysis

8.8K
After a fibrin clot is formed, the next step is clot retraction, a vital process facilitated by platelet contractile proteins, such as actin and myosin. These proteins pull the fibrin strands closer together and condense the clot. This action reduces the size of the clot, creating a smaller, denser structure that effectively seals off the damaged vessel. Clot retraction consolidates the clot and helps with wound healing by bringing the edges of the damaged blood vessel closer together.
8.8K
Cell Motility through Blebbing01:16

Cell Motility through Blebbing

2.5K
Blebs are a type of membrane protrusion formed by the internal hydrostatic pressure of the cytoplasm. Blebs are observed in several cell types, including fibroblasts, immune cells, and single-celled organisms like the amoeba. The primary function of blebs is cell locomotion and apoptosis, but they are also found during necrosis and cell division. The life cycle of a bleb comprises an initiation phase followed by the expansion and retraction phases.
Blebbing Through the Matrix
In multicellular...
2.5K
Energy to Drive Translocation01:37

Energy to Drive Translocation

2.8K
Mitochondrial protein import is powered by two distinct energy sources: ATP hydrolysis and electrochemical potential across the inner membrane. Newly synthesized precursors are bound by cytosolic chaperones of the Hsp70 family, which guide them to the import receptors on the mitochondrial surface. Utilizing the energy of ATP hydrolysis, Hsp70 chaperones transfer these precursors to the TOM receptors on the mitochondrial outer membrane.
Generally, polypeptides are unfolded by two distinct...
2.8K
Actin and Myosin in Muscle Contraction01:16

Actin and Myosin in Muscle Contraction

23.0K
Actin and myosin are contractile proteins that form the sarcomere found in skeletal muscle tissues for regulating muscle contraction. Actin, a globular contractile protein, interacts with myosin for muscle contraction. The skeletal tissue appears striped or striated under a microscope due to the repeated arrangement of contractile proteins actin and myosin along the length of myofibrils. Dark A bands and light I bands repeat along myofibrils, and the alignment of myofibrils in the cell causes...
23.0K
Overview of Myosin Structure and Function01:15

Overview of Myosin Structure and Function

6.5K
Myosins are a family of molecular motor proteins, first identified in the skeletal muscles, where they are responsible for muscle contraction. Along with their role in muscle contraction, these proteins also play a role in the intracellular transport of molecules and vesicles. There are twenty-four classes of myosins based on their domain sequence and organization. Of the twenty-four, six classes (Myosin I, Myosin II, Myosin V, Myosin VI, Myosin VII, and Myosin X)  have been well...
6.5K
Role of Myosin in Cell Migration01:18

Role of Myosin in Cell Migration

3.3K
Myosins are multimeric motor proteins involved in various cellular processes such as migration, adhesion, and proliferation. Myosin II is the most common type in animal cells, which binds and cross-links actin filaments.
Myosin II  is a hexamer comprising two heavy chains with globular heads and coiled-coil tails, two regulatory light chains, and two essential light chains. The ATPase sites on the myosin heads hydrolyze ATP, and the released phosphate generates the force for contraction....
3.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The microtubule GTP-tubulin cap size is modulated during cell division.

Molecular biology of the cell·2026
Same author

The microtubule GTP-tubulin cap size is modulated during cell division.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genetically engineered ESC-derived embryos reveal Vinculin-dependent force responses required for mammalian neural tube closure.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Nonmuscle α-Actinin-4 Couples Sarcomere Function to Cardiac Remodeling.

Circulation research·2025
Same author

Alpha-actinin-1 promotes adhesion maturation and facilitates sarcomere assembly in cardiac myocytes.

Molecular biology of the cell·2025
Same author

α- and β-myosin II can be non-uniformly distributed within the cardiac sarcomere.

iScience·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Micro-drive Array for Chronic in vivo Recording: Drive Fabrication
14:03

Micro-drive Array for Chronic in vivo Recording: Drive Fabrication

Published on: April 20, 2009

25.8K

Myosin IIA drives membrane bleb retraction.

Nilay Taneja1, Dylan T Burnette1

  • 1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232.

Molecular Biology of the Cell
|February 21, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Membrane blebs are temporary structures that form during cell division and migration. These structures go through three phases: nucleation, growth, and retraction. Bleb retraction happens when the actin cortex pulls the bleb back into the cell. Nonmuscle myosin II (MII) is involved in this process. Mammalian cells have three MII isoforms: MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC. This study found that MIIA is the only isoform responsible for bleb retraction during cell division. The motor domain and a specific region of MIIA’s structure are both needed for this process. The study also found that MIIA turnover at the cell cortex is linked to more efficient bleb retraction. These findings clarify the unique role of MIIA in this cellular process.

Keywords:
cell division mechanismsnonmuscle myosin IImembrane bleb dynamicscytoskeletal retraction

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.1K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Micro-drive Array for Chronic in vivo Recording: Drive Fabrication
14:03

Micro-drive Array for Chronic in vivo Recording: Drive Fabrication

Published on: April 20, 2009

25.8K
Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

13.1K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

5.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cell biology of cytoskeletal dynamics
  • Molecular mechanisms of cell division
  • Mechanics of membrane blebbing in developmental biology

Background:

Membrane blebs form during various cellular processes, including division and migration. These structures arise when the plasma membrane detaches from the underlying actin cortex. Bleb formation involves three distinct phases: nucleation, growth, and retraction. During retraction, the actin cortex reassembles and pulls the bleb back into the cell. Nonmuscle myosin II (MII) is known to play a role in this process. Three MII paralogues—MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC—are present in mammalian cells, each with unique properties. Prior research has shown that MII contributes to cortical reassembly and bleb retraction. However, the specific role of each MII isoform in bleb dynamics remains unclear. This gap motivated investigations into which MII paralogue is responsible for bleb retraction. Understanding this distinction could clarify how different MII isoforms contribute to cell division and motility.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aimed to determine which MII isoform is specifically involved in bleb retraction during cytokinesis. The researchers focused on MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC, testing their roles in bleb dynamics. The goal was to identify the specific MII paralogue that drives bleb retraction. The team also sought to understand how MIIA functions in this process. They examined whether the motor domain or the nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA is necessary for bleb retraction. The study aimed to clarify the relationship between MIIA turnover and bleb retraction. This work addresses a key question in cytoskeletal mechanics: which MII isoform is essential for bleb retraction. The findings could help distinguish the functional roles of MII paralogues in cellular processes.

Main Methods:

The researchers used live-cell imaging to observe bleb dynamics in mammalian cells. They employed CRISPR-based gene editing to selectively knock out MIIA, MIIB, and MIIC. Fluorescent tagging allowed tracking of MII isoform localization during bleb retraction. The team measured bleb retraction rates in cells lacking specific MII isoforms. They also tested the effects of disrupting the motor domain or the nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA. Cortical turnover of MIIA was quantified using time-lapse imaging. The experiments compared bleb retraction in control cells and cells with MII isoform knockouts. These methods enabled the researchers to identify MIIA as the driver of bleb retraction.

Main Results:

MIIA was found to be specifically responsible for bleb retraction during cytokinesis. Cells lacking MIIA showed significantly reduced bleb retraction. MIIB and MIIC did not compensate for the loss of MIIA. The motor domain of MIIA is necessary for bleb retraction. The nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA also contributes to its function. Faster turnover of MIIA at the cortex correlates with more efficient bleb retraction. Bleb retraction was not observed in MIIA-deficient cells. These findings indicate that MIIA has a unique role in this process.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that MIIA is uniquely required for bleb retraction during cytokinesis. Their findings suggest that neither MIIB nor MIIC can substitute for MIIA in this process. The motor domain and nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA both contribute to its function. Faster MIIA turnover at the cortex is associated with more effective bleb retraction. These results clarify the distinct roles of MII isoforms in cellular mechanics. The study provides evidence that MIIA is specifically involved in bleb retraction. The authors suggest that MIIA’s unique properties make it well-suited for this role. These findings may help explain how different MII isoforms contribute to cell division.

The researchers found that MIIA is specifically responsible for bleb retraction during cytokinesis.

The nonhelical tailpiece of MIIA contributes to its ability to drive bleb retraction.

The motor domain of MIIA is required for bleb retraction, as its disruption prevents this process.

Faster turnover of MIIA at the cortex correlates with more efficient bleb retraction.

Bleb retraction is significantly reduced in cells lacking MIIA.

The study found that MIIB and MIIC do not compensate for the loss of MIIA in bleb retraction.