Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prediction Intervals01:03

Prediction Intervals

3.4K
The interval estimate of any variable is known as the prediction interval. It helps decide if a point estimate is dependable.
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y. 
3.4K
Predicting Molecular Geometry02:27

Predicting Molecular Geometry

45.7K
VSEPR Theory for Determination of Electron Pair Geometries
45.7K
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

10.6K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
10.6K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.8K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.8K
Random Variables01:09

Random Variables

17.8K
A random variable is a single numerical value that indicates the outcome of a procedure. The concept of random variables is fundamental to the probability theory and was introduced by a Russian mathematician, Pafnuty Chebyshev, in the mid-nineteenth century.
Uppercase letters such as X or Y denote a random variable. Lowercase letters like x or y denote the value of a random variable. If X is a random variable, then X is written in words, and x is given as a number.
For example, let X = the...
17.8K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.0K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clustering and time series analyses of hybrid immunity to SARS-COV-2 using data from the BQC19 biobank.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Comparison of random forest methods for conditional average treatment effect estimation with a continuous treatment.

Statistical methods in medical research·2024
Same author

Ensemble methods for survival function estimation with time-varying covariates.

Statistical methods in medical research·2022
Same author

Conditional canonical correlation estimation based on covariates with random forests.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2021
Same author

Random forests for homogeneous and non-homogeneous Poisson processes with excess zeros.

Statistical methods in medical research·2019
Same author

Barriers and enablers in the use of respite interventions by caregivers of people with dementia: an integrative review.

Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique·2018
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Inference about the ratio of age-standardized rates between two overlapping populations.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems
06:27

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.4K

Prediction intervals with random forests.

Marie-Hélène Roy1, Denis Larocque1

  • 1Department of Decision Sciences, HEC Montreal, Canada.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|February 22, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

New random forest methods significantly improve prediction intervals by enhancing forest construction and interval building techniques. These advanced approaches offer superior performance over traditional parametric methods in diverse settings.

Keywords:
Random forestout-of-bag calibrationprediction intervalsplitting rule

More Related Videos

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.4K
Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

553

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems
06:27

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems

Published on: June 30, 2020

7.4K
Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils
09:16

Methods of Soil Resampling to Monitor Changes in the Chemical Concentrations of Forest Soils

Published on: November 25, 2016

17.4K
Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring
08:16

Collecting and Processing Drone-based Remotely Sensed Data for Use in Forest Recovery Monitoring

Published on: October 24, 2025

553

Area of Science:

  • Machine Learning
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Parametric prediction intervals rely heavily on assumptions about the relationship between variables, limiting their real-world applicability.
  • Random forests offer a non-parametric alternative, but their effectiveness in constructing accurate prediction intervals requires further optimization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate novel methods for constructing more robust and accurate prediction intervals using random forests.
  • To investigate the impact of different forest-building strategies and prediction interval construction techniques on performance.

Main Methods:

  • Explored four forest-building methods, including Classification and Regression Trees (CART) with varied splitting criteria and transformation forests.
  • Developed and assessed five flexible methods for prediction interval construction.
  • Implemented a calibration procedure using out-of-bag data to ensure reliable confidence levels.
  • Compared 20 distinct method variations against five established alternatives via simulations and real-world data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed random forest-based methods demonstrated highly competitive performance.
  • New methods consistently outperformed commonly used prediction interval techniques.
  • Improvements were observed in both simulated environments and analyses of real datasets.

Conclusions:

  • The investigated random forest methods provide a powerful and flexible alternative for building accurate prediction intervals.
  • These enhanced methods overcome limitations of traditional parametric approaches, offering improved reliability and performance.