Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026
Detection and Removal of Tooth-Colored Composite Resin Using the Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique
Published on: July 27, 2022
Bonding of different self-adhesive resins to high-strength composite resin block treated with surface conditioning
Hao Yu1, Keiichi Yoshida2, Hui Cheng3
1Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China; Department of Applied Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.
Purpose:
This study aimed to evaluate the effects of chemical conditioning and self-adhesive resins (SARs) on the bonding of mechanically conditioned high-strength composite resin block (HSCRB).
Methods:
Eighteen sections of HSCRB (KZR-CAD HR 3 Gammatheta, Yamakin) were treated with alumina air abrasion and randomly divided into 3 groups according to the SARs for bonding: RelyX Unicem 2 (RXU), SA Luting Plus (SAL), and G-Cem ONE (GCO). The sections were further divided into 3 subgroups according to the chemical conditioning of the adherend surfaces: no conditioning (C), universal adhesive (UA), and a mixture of γ-MPTS and 10-MDP (MM). After the surface conditioning, the sections were cemented with the SARs. Each cemented section was cut into 40 beams. Half of the beams were thermocycled (4°C/60°C, 10,000 cycles). The micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) values were measured using a universal testing machine. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), contact angles, and surface roughness measurements were performed on the adherend surfaces of each subgroup.
Results:
RXU showed the highest μTBS values among the 3 SARs tested, while MM application exhibited the highest μTBS values among the 3 chemical conditioning methods tested. After thermocycling, the samples in the RXU/MM, RXU/UA, and GCO/MM groups showed no significant changes in the μTBS values, whereas the others showed a significant reduction.
Conclusions:
The bond strength of HSCRB was influenced by the chemical conditioning, SARs, and aging. γ-MPTS and 10-MDP application yielded higher μTBS values of mechanically treated HSCRB than the UA.
Related Concept Videos
01:12Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
00:42Ionic Bonds
When atoms gain or lose electrons to achieve a more stable electron configuration they form ions. Ionic bonds are electrostatic attractions between ions with opposite charges. Ionic compounds are rigid and brittle when solid and may dissociate into their constituent ions in water. Covalent compounds, by contrast, remain intact unless a chemical reaction breaks them.
Opposing Charges Hold Ions Together in Ionic Compounds
Ionic bonds are reversible electrostatic interactions between ions...
02:49Bond Energies and Bond Lengths
03:05Acid Strength and Molecular Structure
In the absence of any leveling effect, the acid strength of binary compounds of hydrogen with nonmetals (A) increases as the H-A bond strength decreases down a group in the periodic table. For group 17, the order of increasing acidity is HF < HCl < HBr < HI. Likewise, for group 16, the order of increasing acid strength is H2O < H2S < H2Se < H2Te. Across a row in the periodic table, the acid strength of binary hydrogen compounds increases with increasing...
01:14Adhesion
Capillary action is a result of water’s adhesive tendencies. When a narrow...
02:43Peptide Bonds