Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Development of the Limb Synovial Joints01:07

Development of the Limb Synovial Joints

2.3K
Joints form during embryonic development in conjunction with the formation and growth of the associated bones. The embryonic tissue that gives rise to all bones, cartilage, and connective tissues of the body is called mesenchyme.
The mesenchymal stem cells differentiate into chondrocytes that form the hyaline cartilage, and later the cartilaginous model of the bone. This model further transforms into a bone. This process is known as endochondral ossification.
During development, the limbs...
2.3K
Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

13.9K
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
Structural Joints: Synovial Joints01:16

Structural Joints: Synovial Joints

6.8K
Synovial joints are the most common type of joint in the body. A key structural characteristic for a synovial joint is the presence of a joint cavity. This fluid-filled space is where the articulating surfaces of the bones contact each other. Also, unlike fibrous or cartilaginous joints, the articulating bone surfaces at a synovial joint are not directly connected to each other with fibrous connective tissue or cartilage. This gives the bones of a synovial joint the ability to move smoothly...
6.8K
Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints01:03

Structural Joints: Fibrous Joints

3.7K
Fibrous joints are a type of joint where the bones are connected by fibrous connective tissue. These joints provide stability and minimal to no movement between the articulating bones. There are three types of fibrous joints.
Suture
All the bones of the skull, except for the mandible, are joined to each other by a fibrous joint called a suture. The fibrous connective tissue found at a suture strongly unites the adjacent skull bones and thus helps to protect the brain and form the face. In...
3.7K
Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints01:17

Structural Joints: Cartilaginous Joints

4.0K
As the name indicates, at a cartilaginous joint, the adjacent bones are united by cartilage, a tough but flexible type of connective tissue. Unlike synovial joints, these types of joints lack a joint cavity and involve bones joined together by either hyaline cartilage or fibrocartilage.
There are two types of cartilaginous joints:
Synchondrosis
A synchondrosis ("joined by cartilage") is a cartilaginous joint where bones are connected by hyaline cartilage. Synchondrosis may be temporary...
4.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance measures across playing categories in competitive golfers with disabilities: a cross-sectional study.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2026
Same author

Sex-specific relationships between sprint swim performance and tethered swimming in high-performance swimmers.

Sports biomechanics·2025
Same author

Centre of pressure golf swing movement strategies are better defined using a continuous approach than by segregated styles.

Journal of sports sciences·2023
Same author

The relationship between skill and ground reaction force variability in amateur golfers.

Sports biomechanics·2021
Same author

Measuring what matters in isometric multi-joint rate of force development.

Journal of sports sciences·2019
Same author

Can we trust "Magnitude-based inference"?

Journal of sports sciences·2018

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Creation of a Knee Joint-on-a-Chip for Modeling Joint Diseases and Testing Drugs
12:44

Creation of a Knee Joint-on-a-Chip for Modeling Joint Diseases and Testing Drugs

Published on: January 27, 2023

4.4K

Multi-joint rate of force development testing protocol affects reliability and the smallest detectible difference.

David Drake1,2, Rodney A Kennedy1,3, Eric S Wallace1,3

  • 1a School of Sport , Ulster University , Newtownabbey , N. Ireland.

Journal of Sports Sciences
|February 28, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The explosive force test protocol is more reliable for assessing rate of force development (RFD) in isometric squats than traditional peak force tests. Researchers should use the explosive protocol for better results.

Keywords:
Explosive forcemaximal strengthneuromuscularstability reliability

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS
05:25

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.7K
Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice
06:37

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice

Published on: September 13, 2024

1.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Creation of a Knee Joint-on-a-Chip for Modeling Joint Diseases and Testing Drugs
12:44

Creation of a Knee Joint-on-a-Chip for Modeling Joint Diseases and Testing Drugs

Published on: January 27, 2023

4.4K
Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS
05:25

Author Spotlight: Assessing Brain Activity in Robotic-Assisted Lower Limb Rehabilitation Using fNIRS

Published on: June 7, 2024

1.7K
Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice
06:37

Temporomandibular Joint Pain Measurement by Bite Force and Von Frey Filament Assays in Mice

Published on: September 13, 2024

1.9K

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Biomechanics
  • Human Movement

Background:

  • Isometric testing is common for assessing rate of force development (RFD).
  • Variations in testing methodology can significantly impact performance outcomes.
  • Standardizing isometric squat testing protocols is crucial for reliable RFD assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the reliability of two isometric squat testing protocols (peak force vs. explosive force).
  • To evaluate the influence of two knee flexion angles (100° and 125°) on RFD measures.
  • To determine the optimal protocol and joint angle for assessing multi-joint RFD.

Main Methods:

  • Eleven strength-trained participants completed test-retest sessions one week apart.
  • Two isometric squat protocols (peak force and explosive force) were assessed.
  • Tests were conducted at two knee flexion angles (100° and 125°), with force-time data analyzed for RFD.

Main Results:

  • Traditional peak force protocols showed unreliable RFD measures at both 100° and 125° knee flexion.
  • The explosive force protocol demonstrated reliability at 100° (RFD 0-200ms, 0-250ms) and 125° (RFD 0-150ms, 0-200ms, 0-250ms).
  • Force-time characteristics were optimized at the greater knee flexion angle (125°).

Conclusions:

  • Average and instantaneous RFD measures from traditional peak force tests lack reliability for multi-joint assessments.
  • The explosive RFD test protocol is recommended over the traditional peak force protocol for more reliable multi-joint RFD assessment.
  • Higher knee joint angles may optimize force-time characteristics in isometric squats.