Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

An Affordable HIV-1 Drug Resistance Monitoring Method for Resource Limited Settings
Published on: March 30, 2014
Selecting topic areas for developing quality standards in a resource-limited setting
Roongnapa Khampang1, Sarayuth Khuntha1, Phorntida Hadnorntun1
1Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Quality standards (QS) can address variations in health promotion and disease prevention. This study outlines the priority-setting process for developing QS, selecting preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage based on evidence and stakeholder input.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Public Health Policy
- Maternal and Child Health
Background:
- Geographical variations in health promotion and disease prevention practices and access exist in Thailand and globally.
- Quality standards (QS) offer a potential solution to standardize and improve healthcare services.
- Developing evidence-informed QS requires a robust priority-setting process.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of the priority-setting process for developing quality standards (QS).
- To describe the criteria used in selecting priority topic areas for QS development.
- To identify key health issues in Thailand suitable for QS implementation.
Main Methods:
- An iterative topic selection process involving multiple steps and stakeholders.
- Review of existing documents on health technology assessment prioritization principles and criteria.
- Stakeholder consultation meetings to discuss healthcare problems and proposed criteria.
- Prioritization based on empirical evidence from literature and stakeholder experiences through a deliberative process.
Main Results:
- Preterm birth, pre-eclampsia, and postpartum hemorrhage were selected as priority topics for QS development.
- These conditions represent significant disease burdens, prevalent among pregnant women in Thailand.
- High maternal and child mortality and morbidity, alongside service variations, justified their selection.
Conclusions:
- Agreed-upon criteria are crucial for effective priority setting in QS development.
- Criteria should be developed and refined collaboratively with diverse stakeholders.
- Engaging implementers and stakeholders actively is essential for the success of QS initiatives.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Limits to Natural Selection
Short-distance Transport of Resources
Limiting Reactant
Sustainable Development
The Number e as a Limit
Types of Limits I

