Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

A Rat Model of Pressure Overload Induced Moderate Remodeling and Systolic Dysfunction as Opposed to Overt Systolic Heart Failure
Published on: April 30, 2020
Interactive role of diastolic dysfunction and ventricular remodeling in asymptomatic subjects at increased risk of
Iacopo Fabiani1, Nicola Riccardo Pugliese2, Salvatore La Carrubba3
1Dipartimento di Patologia Medica, Chirurgica, Molecolare e dell'Area Critica, Università di Pisa, Via Paradisa, 2 - Ospedale Cisanello, Pisa, 56100, Italy.
Insights
Diastolic dysfunction and left ventricular remodeling predict heart failure risk. Combining complex remodeling classification and Nagueh 2016 diastolic function assessment improves risk prediction in asymptomatic patients with preserved ejection fraction.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Echocardiography
- Heart Failure Research
Background:
- Diastolic dysfunction (DD) and left ventricular remodeling (LVR) are key indicators for heart failure (HF) risk.
- Asymptomatic individuals with preserved ejection fraction (EF) and cardiovascular risk factors require accurate prognostic assessment.
- Existing methods for evaluating DD and LVR may vary in their prognostic utility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the prognostic impact of different diastolic function algorithms and a complex LVR classification (CRC) in asymptomatic patients at risk for HF.
- To determine if combining structural (LVR) and functional (DD) assessments improves risk stratification.
- To identify the most effective algorithms for predicting cardiac events in this population.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 1923 asymptomatic patients with at least one cardiovascular risk factor and preserved EF (> >50%).
- Assessment of LV diastolic function using three distinct algorithms (Paulus et al., Nagueh et al. 2009, Nagueh et al. 2016).
- Classification of LVR using both classic and complex remodeling classification (CRC) methods.
- Composite endpoint of cardiac death and HF hospitalization, analyzed via Cox-regression.
Main Results:
- The Nagueh 2016 algorithm identified the lowest prevalence of DD (3.2%).
- CRC classified a significant portion of patients with various remodeling patterns, including 15.5% with concentric remodeling and 15.3% unclassifiable.
- Cox-regression identified CRC (p=0.01) and Nagueh 2016 (p<0.001) as independent predictors of the composite endpoint.
- The combination of adverse LVR by CRC and DD by Nagueh 2016 was associated with the poorest prognosis.
Conclusions:
- A concurrent structural (CRC) and functional (Nagueh 2016) analysis significantly enhances prognostic stratification.
- The Nagueh 2016 algorithm and CRC are valuable tools for identifying high-risk asymptomatic patients.
- Integrating advanced echocardiographic assessments improves the prediction of adverse cardiac events in patients at risk for HF with preserved EF.
Abstract:
Diastolic dysfunction (DD) and left ventricular remodeling (LVR) characterize patients at risk for heart failure (HF). To assess the prognostic impact of different diastolic function algorithms and a complex LVR classification (CRC) in asymptomatic subjects with preserved ejection fraction (EF) at risk for HF. We analyzed 1923 asymptomatic patients (male 43%; age 57, 33-76 years) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor and preserved (> 50%) EF. We used three algorithms for LV diastolic function assessment (Paulus et al. in Eur Heart J 28(20):2539-2550, 2007; Nagueh et al. in J Am Soc Echocardiogr 22(2):107-133, 2009, Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17(12):1321-1360, 2016), and two algorithms for LVR (classic and CRC). We considered a composite end-point: cardiac death and hospitalization for HF. The highest presence of DD was diagnosed by Nagueh 2009 (211, 11%), while the prevalence according to Nagueh 2016 (63 patients, 3.2%) turned out to be the lowest (p < 0.001 vs the other algorithms). According to CRC, 780 (48.6%) patients had normal or physiologic hypertrophy, 298 (15.5%) concentric remodeling, 85 (4.4%) eccentric remodeling, 294 (15.3%) concentric hypertrophy, 39 (2%) mixed hypertrophy, 80 (4.1%) dilated hypertrophy, 73 (3.7%) eccentric hypertrophy and 294 (15.3%) were unclassifiable. After 39-month follow-up (261 events, 13.6%), Cox-regression (adjusted for age, gender, history of stable ischemic heart disease, classic remodeling classification) identified CRC (p = 0.01) and Nagueh 2016 (p < 0.001) as independent predictors of end-point. The coexistence of an adverse LVR by CRC and DD by Nagueh 2016 was associated with the worst prognosis. A concurrent structural (CRC) and functional (Nagueh Op. Cit) analysis improves prognostic stratification in asymptomatic subjects at risk for HF with preserved EF.
More Related Videos
07:49Author Spotlight: Investigating HR-Dependent Cardiac Function in Mouse Models Through a Novel Atrial-Pacing Approach
Published on: July 21, 2023
09:40Induction of Right Ventricular Failure by Pulmonary Artery Constriction and Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Mice
Published on: May 13, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Heart Failure I: Introduction
Nucleosome Remodeling
Nucleosome remodeling complex
Eukaryotic cells have specialized enzymes called ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling enzymes. These enzymes...
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics