Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.

M J Gardner, D G Altman

    British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.)
    |March 15, 1986
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    CONSORT 2010 statement: extension checklist for reporting within person randomised trials.

    The British journal of dermatology·2019
    Same author

    'Allocation concealment': the evolution and adoption of a methodological term.

    Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine·2018
    Same author

    [Better Reporting of Interventions: Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) Checklist and Guide].

    Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2018
    Same author

    GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

    Research involvement and engagement·2017
    Same author

    GRIPP2 reporting checklists: tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research.

    BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2017
    Same author

    Quality control of ultrasound for fetal biometry: results from the INTERGROWTH-21<sup>st</sup> Project.

    Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2017
    Same journal

    Early retirement for consultants.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    From COMAR: Essential troika of teaching, research, and clinical care.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Parliament's two way pull on the NHS.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Conference Report: After the summit.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Council election: South Western regional vacancy 1988-90.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    Same journal

    Health managers support taxation based service.

    British medical journal (Clinical research ed.)·2010
    See all related articles

    Focusing on P values for hypothesis testing overshadows more informative methods like confidence intervals. Confidence intervals provide a range for estimating the true difference in medical study outcomes, offering better interpretation than simple significance.

    Area of Science:

    • Biostatistics
    • Medical Research Methodology

    Background:

    • The common reliance on P values for hypothesis testing in medical research often leads to an oversimplified interpretation of results.
    • This dichotomization into 'significant' or 'non-significant' can obscure the magnitude and precision of observed effects.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To advocate for the use of estimation and confidence intervals over P values for interpreting study findings.
    • To highlight the importance of quantifying the size of differences in medical outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • The paper discusses methods for calculating confidence intervals for means, differences between means, and proportions.
    • It also provides guidance on graphical displays for presenting confidence intervals.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Confidence intervals offer a range of plausible values for population parameters, such as the difference between group means.
    • This approach provides more nuanced information than binary hypothesis testing outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Confidence intervals should be prioritized for reporting major findings in medical research, including abstracts.
    • Utilizing confidence intervals enhances the interpretability and utility of study results.