Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Real-Time Cardiac Mapping with a Noninvasive Imageless Electrocardiographic Imaging System
Published on: April 11, 2025
Implementing Practice Standards for Inpatient Electrocardiographic Monitoring
Sue Sendelbach1, Kristin E Sandau2, Lisa Smith1
1Sue Sendelbach (retired) was director of nursing research, Abbott Northwestern Hospital/Minneapolis Heart Institute/Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Kristin E. Sandau is a professor of nursing, Bethel University, and a staff nurse, United Hospital/Allina Health, St Paul, Minnesota. Lisa Smith is a staff nurse in the cardiovascular laboratory, United Hospital/Allina Health. Steven Hanovich is an intensivist, United Hospital/Allina Health and information services medical director, Allina Health. Robert Kreiger is a senior scientific advisor, Courage/Kenny Center/Allina Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Marjorie Funk is Helen Porter Jayne and Martha Prosser Jayne Professor Emerita of Nursing, Yale University School of Nursing, West Haven, Connecticut.
Background:
Although electrocardiographic monitoring is common in hospitalized patients, many patients receive unnecessary monitoring, contributing to patients' inconvenience, clinicians' alarm fatigue, and delayed admissions.
Objective:
To evaluate the impact of implementation of an electronic order set based on the American Heart Association practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring on the occurrence of appropriate monitoring.
Methods:
The sample for this preintervention-to-postintervention quasi-experimental study consisted of 297 adult patients on medical, surgical, neurological, oncological, and orthopedic patient care units that used remote electrocardiographic monitoring in a 627-bed hospital in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The intervention was the introduction into the electronic health record of order sets prompting physicians to order electrocardiographic monitoring per the American Heart Association practice standards. Indications for monitoring according to the practice standards and adverse outcomes (unexpected transfer to intensive care unit, death, code blue events, and call for the rapid response team) were compared before and after implementation of the order set.
Results:
Implementation of the order set was associated with an increase in appropriate monitoring (48.0% to 61.2%; P = .03); the largest increase was in ordering by medical residents (30.8% to 76.5%; P = .001). No significant increase in adverse patient outcomes was noted.
Conclusions:
Implementation of the practice standards via an electronic order set was associated with a statistically significant increase in appropriate monitoring, with no increase in adverse events. Use of electronic order sets is an effective and safe way to enhance appropriate electrocardiographic monitoring.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
07:59Using Practice Testing, Public Speaking, and Source Monitoring to Examine the Influences of Learning Strategies and Stress on Episodic Memory
Published on: June 14, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Characteristics of Practical Op Amps
The ratio of differential gain to the common-mode gain is defined as the common-mode rejection ratio (CMRR). This ratio quantifies the ability of operational amplifiers (op-amps) to reject common-mode...
Theoretical Foundations of Nursing Practice
Theories provide a perspective to assess patients' conditions and organize data and methods. They also assist in analyzing and interpreting information. They represent a...
Standard Enthalpy of Formation
Standard Electrode Potentials
Measurement: Standard Units