Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Micropatterned Surfaces to Study Hyaluronic Acid Interactions with Cancer Cells
Published on: December 22, 2010
Risk Comparison of Filler Embolism Between Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) and Hyaluronic Acid (HA)
Fangfei Nie1, Hongbin Xie2, Guanhuier Wang1
1Department of Plastic Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Rd., Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, People's Republic of China.
Background:
The incidence of vascular complications varies among different fillers. The main purpose of this study was to compare the risk of embolism between PMMA (Artecoll) and hyaluronic acid (HA, Restylane) after artery injection.
Methods:
Rabbit ears were injected via the central artery with 0.1 ml PMMA (group A), 0.1 ml HA (group B), 0.2 ml PMMA (group C), or 0.2 mL HA (group D), respectively. The formation of transparent emboli was monitored right after injection. Tissue necrosis and histopathological changes were analyzed on day 7.
Results:
With 0.1 ml injected volume, PMMA was dispersed within a few minutes and only 5% of the injected ears had mild necrosis on day 7, while HA tended to form obvious transparent emboli, an indication of blood vessel clotting, and 60% of injected ears showed necrosis on day 7. With 0.2 ml injected volume, PMMA had a risk of complete blood vessel clotting in between 0.1 ml PMMA group and 0.1 ml HA group, and 30% of injected ears had necrosis; in contrast, 100% of 0.2 ml HA-injected ears showed transparent emboli and necrosis. The necrosis areas were significantly increased in the HA groups compared with PMMA groups at the same injection volumes. HA injection also caused dilation of small blood vessels.
Conclusion:
At the same injection volume, PMMA had less risk of embolism compared with HA. With increased injection volume, there were increased risks of embolism and necrosis for both PMMA and HA.
No Level Assigned:
This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Insights
Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) fillers pose a lower risk of vascular embolism and necrosis compared to hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers. Increased injection volume for both PMMA and HA significantly elevates risks of embolism and tissue necrosis.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology
- Plastic Surgery
- Vascular Biology
Background:
- Vascular complications are a known risk associated with dermal fillers.
- The incidence and severity of these complications vary significantly between different filler materials.
- Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) and hyaluronic acid (HA) are common dermal fillers with distinct properties.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the risk of vascular embolism between PMMA (Artecoll) and HA (Restylane) following arterial injection.
- To evaluate the incidence of tissue necrosis and histopathological changes associated with each filler type.
- To assess the impact of injection volume on the safety profile of PMMA and HA fillers.
Main Methods:
- Rabbit ear central arteries were injected with either 0.1 mL or 0.2 mL of PMMA or HA.
- Vascular occlusion (embolism) was monitored immediately post-injection.
- Tissue necrosis and histopathological alterations were analyzed on day 7 post-injection.
Main Results:
- At 0.1 mL, PMMA showed minimal necrosis (5%) with rapid dispersion, while HA caused significant emboli and necrosis (60%).
- At 0.2 mL, PMMA resulted in intermediate clotting risk and 30% necrosis, whereas HA led to 100% emboli and necrosis.
- Necrosis areas were significantly larger with HA compared to PMMA at equal volumes; HA also induced small blood vessel dilation.
Conclusions:
- PMMA demonstrates a lower risk of embolism compared to HA when injected at equivalent volumes.
- Increasing the injection volume of both PMMA and HA increases the risk of both vascular embolism and tissue necrosis.
- These findings highlight differential safety profiles of common dermal fillers, influencing clinical choices.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Additives and Fillers in Concrete
The...
Pulmonary Embolism I: Introduction
Relative Strengths of Conjugate Acid-Base Pairs
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison
Relative Risk
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...

