Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

A Rat Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Resuscitation by Conventional Closed-chest Technique
Published on: April 26, 2015
Conditional Permission to Not Resuscitate: A Middle Ground for Resuscitation
Richard B Stuart1, Stephen Thielke2
1Swedish Edmonds Hospital, Samish Island Volunteer Fire Department, Bow, WA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Insights
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) decisions involve complex ethics. A new DNAR-X option allows patients to customize CPR preferences, enhancing autonomy in medical decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Emergency Medicine
- Patient Autonomy
Background:
- Decisions regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) carry significant ethical weight, often made rapidly with incomplete information.
- CPR outcomes are variable, with potential for success or serious iatrogenic consequences, necessitating informed patient consent.
- Current protocols offer limited choices, typically only allowing patients to accept or refuse CPR.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the ethical implications of CPR decisions.
- To propose an expansion of patient autonomy in CPR choices.
- To introduce the DNAR-X (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation-Except) code as a patient-centered alternative.
Main Methods:
- Ethical analysis of current CPR protocols.
- Conceptual development of the DNAR-X code.
- Review of patient rights in medical decision-making.
Main Results:
- Existing CPR protocols inadequately address patient preferences and autonomy.
- The DNAR-X code offers a nuanced approach, allowing conditional acceptance or refusal of CPR.
- Implementing DNAR-X can significantly improve patient control over their medical interventions.
Conclusions:
- Patients require comprehensive information on CPR outcomes to make informed decisions.
- The DNAR-X code represents a vital advancement in respecting patient autonomy and values.
- Expanding resuscitation options beyond a simple yes/no is ethically imperative.
Abstract:
Every decision to perform or withhold cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has ethical implications that are not always well understood. Value-based decisions with far-reaching consequences are made rapidly, based on incomplete or possibly inaccurate information. For some patients, skilled, timely CPR can restore spontaneous circulation, but for others, success may either be unobtainable or bring serious iatrogenic consequences. Because CPR is an aggressive process yielding mixed results, patients must be informed about the likelihood of its positive and adverse outcomes. In considering whether to accept or refuse it, patients should also be given a realistic set of alternatives. Current protocols limit patients' options by restricting them to a choice between accepting or refusing CPR. Adding a "middle" code, DNAR-X (Do Not Attempt Resuscitation-Except), significantly expands patients' right to control what happens to their bodies by allowing them to stipulate CPR in some circumstances but not in others.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation V: Advanced Airway Management Techniques
Taping Over Different Ground Profiles

