Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Analysis of Congenital Heart Defects in Mouse Embryos Using Qualitative and Quantitative Histological Methods
Published on: March 10, 2020
Use of Both Qualitative and Quantitative Methods to Estimate Meaningful Change Thresholds for Key Endpoints in
Rob Arbuckle1, Hannah Staunton1, Kate Sully1
1Adelphi Values, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK.
Insights
Children and parents can estimate meaningful changes in asthma control, including symptom-free days (SFDs) and rescue medication-free days (RFDs). This research provides valuable data for pediatric asthma clinical trials.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Pulmonology
- Clinical Trial Endpoints
- Asthma Management
Background:
- Symptom-free days (SFDs) and rescue medication-free days (RFDs) are key clinical trial endpoints for asthma.
- Meaningful change estimates for SFDs and RFDs are lacking in pediatric populations.
- The Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) is a crucial tool for assessing asthma control in children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish meaningful within-patient change estimates for SFDs and RFDs in pediatric asthma.
- To generate updated estimates for meaningful change in the C-ACT for children aged 5-11.
- To provide evidence supporting the interpretation of clinical trial results in pediatric asthma.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative interviews with children (8-11 years) and parents/caregivers (4-11 years) of children with asthma.
- Participants completed daily asthma diaries for 4-9 days prior to interviews.
- Exploration of patient and caregiver perceptions of meaningful change in asthma symptoms and control.
Main Results:
- Parent/caregiver estimates of meaningful change in SFDs aligned with children's reports (1.8 vs. 1.4 SFDs).
- Both children and parents could articulate meaningful changes at the item level for the C-ACT.
- Qualitative data suggest meaningful C-ACT change estimates of 1-3 categories, potentially translating to 7-15 points on the total score.
Conclusions:
- Children with asthma and their caregivers can quantitatively and qualitatively assess meaningful changes in SFDs and RFDs.
- Findings support the use of SFDs, RFDs, and C-ACT as meaningful endpoints in pediatric asthma research.
- This study provides essential data for interpreting the clinical significance of treatment effects in pediatric asthma trials.
Introduction:
Diary-derived symptom score and rescue medication use endpoints, such as symptom-free days (SFDs) and rescue medication-free days (RFD), are frequently used as clinical trial endpoints. Estimates of meaningful change for SFDs and RFDs have not been generated in pediatric populations. This research aimed to generate evidence supporting estimates of the individual within-patient changes that constitute an important or meaningful change in SFDs, RFDs, and updated estimates on the Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) in pediatric asthma populations aged 5-11 years.
Methods:
Semistructured, qualitative interviews were conducted with children (ages 8-11 years) who had asthma and parents/caregivers of children (4-11 years) with asthma. Before the interview (4-9 days) participants were asked to complete a morning and evening diary.
Results:
On average, parent/caregiver estimates of the difference in SFDs between a "very bad" and a "little bad" week for their children's asthma were largely concordant with the values reported by their children (differences of 1.8 and 1.4 SFDs, respectively). Both parents/caregivers and children were able to articulate what a meaningful level of change would be on the C-ACT at the item level. This qualitative study generated C-ACT item-level meaningful change estimates in the region of 1-3 category change, which potentially suggests that, if scaled up to represent C-ACT total score, this would lead to change estimates of 7-15 points.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that both children with asthma and parents/caregivers can quantitatively estimate and to some extent qualitatively articulate meaningful change in SFDs and RFDs.
More Related Videos
07:24A Hybrid DNA Extraction Method for the Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of Bacterial Communities from Poultry Production Samples
Published on: December 10, 2014
06:31Estimating Vestibular Perceptual Thresholds Using a Six-Degree-Of-Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: August 4, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Precipitation Titration: Endpoint Detection Methods
In the Volhard method, a standard excess of AgNO3 is first added to the...
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Asthma-I: Introduction
Key Techniques in Microbiology
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition