Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Small Populations02:04

Conservation of Small Populations

16.6K
Small population sizes put a species at extreme risk of extinction due to a lack of variation, and a consequent decrease in adaptability. This weakens the chances of survival under pressures such as climate change, competition from other species, or new diseases. Large populations are more likely to survive pressures such as these, as such populations are more likely to harbor individuals that have genetic variants that are adaptive under new stresses. Small populations are much less...
16.6K
Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter01:26

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

5.0K
The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...
5.0K
Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation01:22

Estimating Population Mean with Unknown Standard Deviation

8.7K
In practice, we rarely know the population standard deviation. In the past, when the sample size was large, this did not present a problem to statisticians. They used the sample standard deviation s as an estimate for σ and proceeded as before to calculate a confidence interval with close enough results. However, statisticians ran into problems when the sample size was small. A small sample size caused inaccuracies in the confidence interval.
William S. Gosset (1876–1937) of the...
8.7K
Estimating Population Standard Deviation01:26

Estimating Population Standard Deviation

3.3K
When the population standard deviation is unknown and the sample size is large, the sample standard deviation s is commonly used as a point estimate of σ. However, it can sometimes under or overestimate the population standard deviation. To overcome this drawback, confidence intervals are determined to estimate population parameters and eliminate any calculation bias accurately. However, this only applies to random samples from normally distributed populations. Knowing the sample mean and...
3.3K
Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation01:16

Estimating Population Mean with Known Standard Deviation

9.6K
To construct a confidence interval for a single unknown population mean μ, where the population standard deviation is known, we need sample mean as an estimate for μ and we need the margin of error. Here, the margin of error (EBM) is called the error bound for a population mean (abbreviated EBM). The sample mean is the point estimate of the unknown population mean μ.
The confidence interval estimate will have the form as follows:
(point estimate - error bound, point estimate +...
9.6K
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data01:12

Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data

657
Analysis of population pharmacokinetic data involves studying the behavior of drugs within diverse populations to understand their pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditional pharmacokinetic methods typically involve collecting samples from a few individuals and estimating these parameters. While these methods are commonly used, they have limitations in capturing the variability in drug response among individuals or heterogeneous populations. Population pharmacokinetics is employed to address these...
657

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dynamics of genetic and somatic trade-offs in ageing and mortality.

Nature·2026
Same author

Multi-generational koala pedigree analysis reveals rapid changes in heritable provirus load associated with life history traits.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Surviving the Heat: Genetic Diversity and Adaptation in Sudanese Butana Cattle.

Genes·2025
Same author

Relationship between intramuscular fat content in longissimus thoracis and hair fatty acids in finishing crossbred bulls.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Genetic Modulation of Lifespan: Dynamic Effects, Sex Differences, and Body Weight Trade-offs.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Whole-Genome Insights into the Genetic Basis of Conformation Traits in German Black Pied (DSN) Cattle.

Genes·2025

Related Experiment Videos

Finding the Optimal Imputation Strategy for Small Cattle Populations.

Paula Korkuć1, Danny Arends1, Gudrun A Brockmann1

  • 1Animal Breeding Biology and Molecular Genetics, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute for Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Frontiers in Genetics
|March 6, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Optimizing SNP imputation for small cattle populations like German Black Pied cattle (DSN) is crucial. Using a large, same-breed reference panel is key for accurate whole-genome imputation, especially when high-density genotypes are limited.

Keywords:
1000 Bull Genomes ProjectDSNHolsteinSNPSNP chipcattleimputationsequencing

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Animal Breeding
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • SNP imputation is vital for generating high-density genotypes from lower-density chips.
  • Small or endangered cattle populations present unique challenges for imputation due to limited high-density genotype data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore optimal imputation strategies for low-density SNP chip genotypes to whole-genome sequence level in small cattle populations.
  • To evaluate the impact of phasing, imputation step approaches (1-step vs. 2-step), software tools (Beagle, Minimac), and reference panel characteristics on imputation accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to assess imputation accuracy.
  • Analyses involved 30 German Black Pied cattle (DSN) and 30 Holstein Frisian cattle from the 1000 Bull Genomes Project.
  • Compared 1-step (50k to sequence) and 2-step (50k to 700k, then to sequence) imputation, and assessed Beagle vs. Minimac performance with varying reference panel sizes and compositions.

Main Results:

  • Phasing significantly impacts imputation accuracy for both target populations and reference panels.
  • Minimac performed better with smaller reference panels, while Beagle excelled with larger ones.
  • The 1-step imputation approach showed higher accuracy than 2-step when few animals were available at the intermediate step.
  • Reference panel size is the most critical factor for accuracy; however, including a related but different breed (Holstein Frisian) reduced accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • For small cattle populations, a large reference panel of the same breed is recommended for accurate whole-genome imputation.
  • If a large same-breed panel is unavailable, a smaller same-breed panel without including different breeds is preferable.
  • These findings offer practical guidance for genomic imputation in resource-limited cattle populations.