Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

10.9K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
10.9K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

13.7K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
13.7K
Random Error01:04

Random Error

9.7K
Random or indeterminate errors originate from various uncontrollable variables, such as variations in environmental conditions, instrument imperfections, or the inherent variability of the phenomena being measured. Usually, these errors cannot be predicted, estimated, or characterized because their direction and magnitude often vary in magnitude and direction even during consecutive measurements. As a result, they are difficult to eliminate. However, the aggregate effect of these errors can be...
9.7K
Margin of Error01:27

Margin of Error

7.6K
The margin of error is also called the maximum error of an estimate. The margin of error is the maximum possible or expected difference between the observed sample parameter value and the actual population parameter value. For proportion, it is the maximum difference between the value of sample proportion obtained from the data and the true value of population proportion. As the true value of the population parameter is not known, the margin of error is calculated using the sample statistic.
7.6K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

367
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
367
Standard Error of the Mean01:13

Standard Error of the Mean

12.3K
The sampling variability of a statistic is defined as how much the statistic varies from one sample to another. The sampling variability of a statistic is typically measured by measuring its standard error.
The standard error of the mean is an example of a standard error. It is a unique standard deviation known as the standard deviation of the sampling distribution of the mean. The standard error of the mean is a statistic that calculates how correctly a sample distribution represents a...
12.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The 2026 global roadmap for textile-integrated wearable technologies in health.

Physiological measurement·2026
Same author

Correction: A decade of Cybathlon: impact on public visibility, scientific dissemination and technology transfer.

Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Correction: ROS 4 healthcare: a framework for physiological human sensing for social, assistive, rehabilitation, and medical robotics.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026
Same author

Shopping in immersive virtual reality: Effects of visual, auditory, and cognitive demands on mental workload.

Applied ergonomics·2026
Same author

Interpretable Force Perturbations Promote Gait Variability Without Affecting Perceived Exoskeleton Transparency.

IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society·2026
Same author

ROS 4 healthcare: a framework for physiological human sensing for social, assistive, rehabilitation, and medical robotics.

Frontiers in robotics and AI·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K

Haptic Error Modulation Outperforms Visual Error Amplification When Learning a Modified Gait Pattern.

Laura Marchal-Crespo1,2, Panagiotis Tsangaridis2, David Obwegeser2

  • 1Gerontechnology and Rehabilitation Group, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Frontiers in Neuroscience
|March 7, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Novel robotic gait training using haptic error amplification improved motor learning and motivation. This method enhances adaptation of asymmetric gaits safely, outperforming visual error amplification for neurorehabilitation.

Keywords:
error amplificationforce disturbancehaptic guidancemotor adaptationmotor learningrehabilitation roboticsrobotic gait-trainingvisual feedback

More Related Videos

Adaptation of a Haptic Robot in a 3T fMRI
08:16

Adaptation of a Haptic Robot in a 3T fMRI

Published on: October 4, 2011

10.1K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 28, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
07:07

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice

Published on: June 5, 2016

9.1K
Adaptation of a Haptic Robot in a 3T fMRI
08:16

Adaptation of a Haptic Robot in a 3T fMRI

Published on: October 4, 2011

10.1K
Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms
09:30

Genome-wide Surveillance of Transcription Errors in Eukaryotic Organisms

Published on: September 13, 2018

9.9K

Area of Science:

  • Robotics in Rehabilitation
  • Motor Learning
  • Neurorehabilitation

Background:

  • Robotic systems offer promising gait training strategies for motor learning and neurorehabilitation.
  • Previous research focused on upper limbs due to safety concerns with large errors during gait training.
  • Systematic large errors can negatively impact participant motivation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate novel error modulating strategies for safe robotic gait training.
  • To evaluate the impact of haptic and visual error amplification on motor learning and motivation.
  • To assess the effect of increased movement variability on gait adaptation.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty healthy participants trained an asymmetric gait pattern using the Lokomat exoskeletal robotic system.
  • Three strategies were compared: no disturbance, haptic error amplification, and visual error amplification.
  • Movement variability was manipulated by adding random haptic disturbances.

Main Results:

  • Haptic error amplification facilitated motor adaptation and transfer of the asymmetric gait pattern without hindering performance.
  • Visual error amplification increased errors, hampered learning, and reduced perceived competence.
  • Adding haptic disturbances increased movement variability but did not significantly enhance motor adaptation.

Conclusions:

  • Novel haptic error modulating controllers that amplify small, relevant errors while limiting large ones show promise for robotic gait training.
  • This approach outperforms visual error augmentation and may improve outcomes for neurological patients.
  • Ensuring participant competence is crucial for effective robotic gait training.