Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 28, 2026
06:11
A Conflict Model of Reward-seeking Behavior in Male Rats
Published on: February 20, 2019
7.8K
Acute stress improves long-term reward maximization in decision-making under uncertainty
Kaileigh A Byrne1, Astin C Cornwall2, Darrell A Worthy2
1Clemson University, United States.
Brain and Cognition
|March 8, 2019
Summary
Acute stress enhances decision-making by improving the ability to choose long-term rewards over immediate ones. This study explored how stress affects choices involving delayed gratification and learning from experience.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Behavioral Economics
Background:
- Acute stress impacts reward-seeking and risk-taking behaviors.
- The effect of acute stress on learning to balance immediate versus delayed rewards remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if acute stress enhances the salience of immediate or delayed rewards.
- To determine how acute stress influences decision-making under uncertainty involving learned reward values.
Main Methods:
- The Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Task (SECPT) was used to induce acute stress.
- Participants completed a decision-making task requiring learning to forgo immediate rewards for larger, delayed ones.
- Experiment 2 included salivary cortisol measurements to assess physiological stress response.
Main Results:
- Acute stress significantly improved decisions favoring long-term, large rewards over immediate, small rewards.
- Behavioral findings were replicated in a second experiment.
- Increased salivary cortisol levels confirmed the effectiveness of the stress manipulation.
Conclusions:
- Moderate acute stress can enhance decision-making under uncertainty.
- Stress improves the capacity to learn and maximize long-term rewards from experience.
- Cortisol levels may serve as a physiological indicator for stress-induced decision-making changes.
Related Concept Videos
04:08The Uncertainty Principle
31.7K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
31.7K
02:46Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
51.4K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
51.4K
00:59Uncertainty: Overview
1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
03:34Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures
81.3K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
81.3K
00:54Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
11.6K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.6K
03:37Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
100.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.
100.8K